Ahbap Elbis, Sakaci Tamer, Kara Ekrem, Sahutoglu Tuncay, Koc Yener, Basturk Taner, Sevinc Mustafa, Akgol Cuneyt, Kayalar Arzu O, Ucar Zuhal A, Bayraktar Feyza, Unsal Abdulkadir
Clin Nephrol. 2016 Apr;85(4):199-208. doi: 10.5414/CN108584.
To evaluate the relationship between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and inflammation in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD).
100 ESRD patients on maintenance HD (mean ± SD age: 52.3 ± 1.7 years, 52% were males) were included in this cross-sectional study. Data on patient demographics, dry weight, body mass index, duration of HD (months), etiology of ESRD, delivered dose of dialysis (spKt/V), complete blood count, blood biochemistry and inflammatory markers including hs-CRP (mg/L), TNF-α (pg/mL), NLR, and PLR were recorded in all patients and compared in patients with hs-CRP levels of ≤ 3 mg/L vs. > 3 mg/L. other study parameters were also recorded.
Compared to patients with lower hs-CRP levels, patients with hs-CRP levels of > 3 mg/L had significantly higher values for NLR (3.7 ± 0.2 vs. 2.7 ± 0.2, p < 0.01) and PLR (150.7 ± 6.9 vs. 111.8 ± 7.0, p < 0.001). Both NLR and PLR were positively correlated with hs-CRP (r = 0.333, p = 0.01 and r = 0.262, p = 0.001, respectively) and negatively correlated with transferrin saturation (%) (r = -0.418, p = 0.001 and r = -0.309, p = 0.002, respectively).
Our findings in a cohort of ESRD patients on maintenance HD revealed higher values for NLR and PLR in patients with higher levels of inflammation along with a significant positive correlation of both NLR and PLR with hs-CRP levels. Being a simple, relatively inexpensive and universally available method, whether or not calculation of NLR and PLR offers a plausible strategy in the evaluation of inflammation in ESRD patients in the clinical practice should be addressed in larger scale randomized and controlled studies.
评估维持性血液透析(HD)的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)与炎症之间的关系。
本横断面研究纳入了100例接受维持性HD的ESRD患者(平均年龄±标准差:52.3±1.7岁,52%为男性)。记录所有患者的人口统计学数据、干体重、体重指数、HD时长(月)、ESRD病因、透析剂量(spKt/V)、全血细胞计数、血液生化指标以及包括高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP,mg/L)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α,pg/mL)、NLR和PLR在内的炎症标志物,并比较hs-CRP水平≤3mg/L与>3mg/L的患者。还记录了其他研究参数。
与hs-CRP水平较低的患者相比,hs-CRP水平>3mg/L的患者NLR(3.7±0.2对2.7±0.2,p<0.01)和PLR(150.7±6.9对111.8±7.0,p<0.001)的值显著更高。NLR和PLR均与hs-CRP呈正相关(r分别为0.333,p=0.01和0.262,p=0.001),与转铁蛋白饱和度(%)呈负相关(r分别为-0.418,p=0.001和-0.309,p=0.002)。
我们在一组接受维持性HD的ESRD患者中的研究结果显示,炎症水平较高的患者NLR和PLR值更高,且NLR和PLR均与hs-CRP水平呈显著正相关。作为一种简单、相对廉价且普遍可用的方法,在临床实践中计算NLR和PLR是否为评估ESRD患者炎症提供了一种可行策略,应在更大规模的随机对照研究中加以探讨。