O'Leary Sean T, Hurley Laura P, Kennedy Erin D, Crane Lori A, Brtnikova Michaela, Allison Mandy A, Williams Warren, Beaty Brenda L, Jimenez-Zambrano Andrea, Kempe Allison
Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, Colo; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colo. Electronic address: sean.o'
Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, Colo; Division of General Internal Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, Colo.
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.04.038. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
To assess among US pediatricians' systems for tracking vaccine administration and inventory and attitudes about these systems; and attitudes regarding and perceived barriers to adoption of a 2-dimensional bar code systems.
Internet and mail survey of a nationally representative network of pediatricians between September 2011 and January 2012.
The response rate was 71% (288 of 408). The most common methods for recording vaccine information were manual entry into an electronic (52%) or paper (27%) record; 76% recorded information in ≥2 places. Physicians reported ordering vaccine on the basis of seasonal increases in demand (55%), paper-based inventory (52%), or when stock looks low (47%); 79% reported it was time consuming to track inventory and 24% reported their practices frequently run out of vaccines. Among those participating in an immunization information system, 29% transmitted data by automatic uploads and 58% entered data manually. Physicians agreed that bar codes could facilitate tracking of vaccine inventory (96%), would improve patient safety (96%), would be more reliable and accurate than current systems (93%), and could improve the efficiency of vaccine administration (90%). Barriers to adoption of a bar code system included need for software (52%), information technology support (42%), and computer equipment (33%). The total cost at which >50% reported they would definitely or probably adopt a bar code system was between $1000 and $4999.
Most pediatricians report using inefficient systems for tracking vaccine administration and inventory and recognize multiple potential benefits of incorporating vaccine bar coding into their practice. To facilitate adoption, costs will need to be contained and technological barriers addressed.
评估美国儿科医生追踪疫苗接种和库存的系统以及他们对这些系统的态度;以及对采用二维条形码系统的态度和感知到的障碍。
在2011年9月至2012年1月期间,对全国具有代表性的儿科医生网络进行互联网和邮件调查。
回复率为71%(408名中的288名)。记录疫苗信息最常见的方法是手动录入电子(52%)或纸质(27%)记录;76%在≥2个地方记录信息。医生报告根据需求的季节性增加(55%)、纸质库存(52%)或库存看起来不足时(47%)订购疫苗;79%报告追踪库存很耗时,24%报告他们的诊所经常疫苗短缺。在参与免疫信息系统的人中,29%通过自动上传传输数据,58%手动输入数据。医生们一致认为条形码可以方便追踪疫苗库存(96%),能提高患者安全性(96%),比现有系统更可靠、准确(93%),并能提高疫苗接种效率(90%)。采用条形码系统的障碍包括需要软件(52%)、信息技术支持(42%)和计算机设备(33%)。超过50%的人报告他们肯定或可能采用条形码系统的总成本在1000美元至4999美元之间。
大多数儿科医生报告使用低效的系统来追踪疫苗接种和库存,并认识到将疫苗条形码纳入其业务的多种潜在好处。为便于采用,需要控制成本并解决技术障碍。