Wodchis Walter P, Dixon Anna, Anderson Geoff M, Goodwin Nick
Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto.
Centre for Ageing Better, London, UK.
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Sep 23;15:e021. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2249. eCollection 2015 Apr-Jun.
To address the challenges of caring for a growing number of older people with a mix of both health problems and functional impairment, programmes in different countries have different approaches to integrating health and social service supports.
The goal of this analysis is to identify important lessons for policy makers and service providers to enable better design, implementation and spread of successful integrated care models.
This paper provides a structured cross-case synthesis of seven integrated care programmes in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK and the USA.
All seven programmes involved bottom-up innovation driven by local needs and included: (1) a single point of entry, (2) holistic care assessments, (3) comprehensive care planning, (4) care co-ordination and (5) a well-connected provider network. The process of achieving successful integration involves collaboration and, although the specific types of collaboration varied considerably across the seven case studies, all involved a care coordinator or case manager. Most programmes were not systematically evaluated but the two with formal external evaluations showed benefit and have been expanded.
Case managers or care coordinators who support patient-centred collaborative care are key to successful integration in all our cases as are policies that provide funds and support for local initiatives that allow for bottom-up innovation. However, more robust and systematic evaluation of these initiatives is needed to clarify the 'business case' for integrated health and social care and to ensure successful generalization of local successes.
为应对照顾越来越多同时患有健康问题和功能障碍的老年人所面临的挑战,不同国家的项目采用了不同的方法来整合卫生和社会服务支持。
本分析的目标是为政策制定者和服务提供者找出重要经验教训,以促进成功的综合护理模式得到更好的设计、实施和推广。
本文对澳大利亚、加拿大、荷兰、新西兰、瑞典、英国和美国的七个综合护理项目进行了结构化的跨案例综合分析。
所有七个项目都涉及由当地需求驱动的自下而上的创新,包括:(1)单一入口点;(2)整体护理评估;(3)全面护理规划;(4)护理协调;(5)联系紧密的提供者网络。实现成功整合的过程需要协作,尽管七个案例研究中的协作具体类型差异很大,但都涉及护理协调员或个案经理。大多数项目没有进行系统评估,但两个进行了正式外部评估的项目显示出了益处并得到了扩展。
在我们所有案例中,支持以患者为中心的协作护理的个案经理或护理协调员对于成功整合至关重要,为允许自下而上创新的地方举措提供资金和支持的政策也是如此。然而,需要对这些举措进行更有力和系统的评估,以阐明综合卫生和社会护理的“商业案例”,并确保地方成功经验得以成功推广。