Zinner Ralph, Visseren-Grul Carla, Spigel David R, Obasaju Coleman
Departments of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, and Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
EU Lead, Late Phase Development, Lilly Oncology, Lilly Nederland B.V., 3991 RA Houten, The Netherlands.
Int J Oncol. 2016 Jan;48(1):13-27. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3219. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
Because poor performance status (PS) is an independent prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), PS scores are widely used by oncologists to make treatment decisions. Advanced NSCLC patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS of 2 have poor prognoses and are frequently excluded from clinical trials. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in this patient group. We identified English-language literature (through March 2015) involving completed and ongoing studies through searches of PubMed, meeting abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Clinical Trials Register; search terms included 'pemetrexed,' 'NSCLC' and 'PS2'. Only studies reporting ≥1 subset analysis of PS2 patients receiving pemetrexed were chosen. Our search identified a total of ten pemetrexed studies in PS2 patients. Eight studies included only chemonaive patients, one study included both chemonaive patients and patients with one prior chemotherapy regimen and one study included only patients with one prior regimen. In subset analyses in these studies, PS2 patients had worse outcomes than PS0-1 patients regardless of treatment. In a phase 3 study, chemonaive advanced NSCLC patients with PS2 receiving pemetrexed‑carboplatin versus pemetrexed experienced improved overall survival [hazard ratio (HR)=0.62; P=0.001], progression-free survival (HR=0.46; P<0.001) and response (P=0.032). This review confirms the poorer outcomes in PS2 vs. PS0-1 patients. Although it is not an approved combination therapy, in clinical studies, PS2 patients treated with pemetrexed plus carboplatin as first-line therapy had improved response rates and survival. Additional research on PS2 patients is needed.
由于较差的体能状态(PS)是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的独立预后因素,PS评分被肿瘤学家广泛用于制定治疗决策。东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分为2的晚期NSCLC患者预后较差,常被排除在临床试验之外。本文综述了培美曲塞在该患者群体中的疗效和安全性。我们通过检索PubMed、会议摘要、ClinicalTrials.gov和欧洲临床试验注册库,确定了截至2015年3月的涉及已完成和正在进行研究的英文文献;检索词包括“培美曲塞”、“NSCLC”和“PS2”。仅选择报告了≥1项接受培美曲塞治疗的PS2患者亚组分析的研究。我们的检索共识别出10项关于PS2患者的培美曲塞研究。8项研究仅纳入初治患者,1项研究纳入了初治患者和接受过1次既往化疗方案的患者,1项研究仅纳入接受过1次既往化疗方案的患者。在这些研究的亚组分析中,无论接受何种治疗,PS2患者的预后均比PS0 - 1患者差。在一项3期研究中,初治的PS2晚期NSCLC患者接受培美曲塞 - 卡铂治疗与接受培美曲塞治疗相比,总生存期得到改善[风险比(HR)=0.62;P = 0.001],无进展生存期(HR = 0.46;P < 0.001)和缓解率(P = 0.032)均有所提高。本综述证实PS2患者与PS0 - 1患者相比预后更差。尽管这不是一种获批的联合治疗方案,但在临床研究中,PS2患者接受培美曲塞加卡铂作为一线治疗,缓解率和生存率有所提高。仍需对PS2患者进行更多研究。