da Silva Rubens A, Vieira Edgar R, Cabrera Marcos, Altimari Leandro R, Aguiar Andreo F, Nowotny Alexandre H, Carvalho Adriana F, Oliveira Marcio R
Center for Health Science Research, Laboratory of Functional Evaluation and Human Motor Performance (LAFUP), Universidade Norte do Paraná (UNOPAR), 675 Paris Av, Londrina, PR, Brazil; Doctoral and Masters Program in Rehabilitation Sciences UEL/UNOPAR, 675 Paris Av, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Florida International University (FIU), Physical Therapy & Neuroscience Departments, Wertheims' Colleges of Nursing and Health Sciences & Medicine, 11200 SW 8th St., AHC3-430, Miami, FL, USA.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Dec;25(6):928-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
The purpose of this study was to compare back muscle fatigue of younger and older participants with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). Twenty participants without and 20 with nonspecific CLBP participated in this study. Each group contained 10 younger (50% males; mean age: 31 ± 6 yrs) and 10 older adults (50% males; age mean: 71 ± 7 yrs). Two isometric fatigue protocols were presented randomly: (1) to maintain the unsupported trunk at the horizontal position while on a 45° Roman chair for a minute, and (2) to maintain a 10% of body weight box close to the trunk in the upright position for a minute. Surface electromyography (EMG) signals from the back (multifidus and iliocostalis) and one hip (biceps femoris) muscles were recorded bilaterally, and the median frequency fatigue estimate from linear regression slopes of the EMG time-series was computed. There were no significant (P > 0.05) age effects, and group-by-age interaction in both isometric and functional fatigue tasks. However, the CLBP groups (both younger and old) displayed more back fatigue than people without CLBP in both fatigue protocols (P < 0.01; effect size varying of d = 0.17-0.32). This study was sensitive to discriminate that individuals with CLBP did present significantly more pronounced EMG back fatigue than people without CLBP, in both younger and older adults. These results have significant clinical implications for low back pain rehabilitation programs with regard to endurance assessment in both younger and older.
本研究的目的是比较有无慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的年轻和年长参与者的背部肌肉疲劳情况。20名无CLBP的参与者和20名患有非特异性CLBP的参与者参与了本研究。每组包含10名年轻人(50%为男性;平均年龄:31±6岁)和10名年长者(50%为男性;平均年龄:71±7岁)。随机呈现两种等长疲劳方案:(1)在45°罗马椅上保持无支撑的躯干处于水平位置一分钟,(2)在直立位置保持一个相当于体重10%的箱子靠近躯干一分钟。双侧记录背部(多裂肌和髂肋肌)和一侧臀部(股二头肌)肌肉的表面肌电图(EMG)信号,并根据EMG时间序列的线性回归斜率计算中位频率疲劳估计值。在等长和功能性疲劳任务中,年龄效应和年龄组交互作用均无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,在两种疲劳方案中,CLBP组(包括年轻组和老年组)均比无CLBP的人表现出更多的背部疲劳(P<0.01;效应大小d = 0.17 - 0.32)。本研究能够敏感地辨别出,无论年轻还是年长,患有CLBP的个体比无CLBP的人在EMG背部疲劳方面表现得更为明显。这些结果对于年轻和年长人群的下腰痛康复计划中的耐力评估具有重要的临床意义。