Guetterman Timothy C, Fetters Michael D, Creswell John W
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):554-61. doi: 10.1370/afm.1865.
Mixed methods research is becoming an important methodology to investigate complex health-related topics, yet the meaningful integration of qualitative and quantitative data remains elusive and needs further development. A promising innovation to facilitate integration is the use of visual joint displays that bring data together visually to draw out new insights. The purpose of this study was to identify exemplar joint displays by analyzing the various types of joint displays being used in published articles.
We searched for empirical articles that included joint displays in 3 journals that publish state-of-the-art mixed methods research. We analyzed each of 19 identified joint displays to extract the type of display, mixed methods design, purpose, rationale, qualitative and quantitative data sources, integration approaches, and analytic strategies. Our analysis focused on what each display communicated and its representation of mixed methods analysis.
The most prevalent types of joint displays were statistics-by-themes and side-by-side comparisons. Innovative joint displays connected findings to theoretical frameworks or recommendations. Researchers used joint displays for convergent, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and intervention designs. We identified exemplars for each of these designs by analyzing the inferences gained through using the joint display. Exemplars represented mixed methods integration, presented integrated results, and yielded new insights.
Joint displays appear to provide a structure to discuss the integrated analysis and assist both researchers and readers in understanding how mixed methods provides new insights. We encourage researchers to use joint displays to integrate and represent mixed methods analysis and discuss their value.
混合方法研究正成为调查复杂健康相关主题的重要方法,但定性和定量数据的有意义整合仍然难以实现,需要进一步发展。促进整合的一项有前景的创新是使用可视化联合展示,它能将数据直观地整合在一起以得出新的见解。本研究的目的是通过分析已发表文章中使用的各种类型的联合展示来识别典范联合展示。
我们在3种发表前沿混合方法研究的期刊中搜索包含联合展示的实证文章。我们分析了19个已识别的联合展示中的每一个,以提取展示类型、混合方法设计、目的、基本原理、定性和定量数据源、整合方法以及分析策略。我们的分析重点在于每个展示传达的内容及其对混合方法分析的呈现。
最常见的联合展示类型是按主题统计和并排比较。创新的联合展示将研究结果与理论框架或建议联系起来。研究人员将联合展示用于收敛性、解释性序列、探索性序列和干预设计。我们通过分析使用联合展示获得的推论,为每种设计确定了典范。典范体现了混合方法的整合,呈现了综合结果,并产生了新的见解。
联合展示似乎为讨论综合分析提供了一个框架,并有助于研究人员和读者理解混合方法如何提供新的见解。我们鼓励研究人员使用联合展示来整合和呈现混合方法分析,并讨论其价值。