Blackmore C Craig, Castro Alexandra
The Center for Healthcare Improvement Science and Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
The Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1385-92. doi: 10.1111/acem.12816. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
Imaging is critical for the care of emergency department (ED) patients. However, much of the imaging performed for acute care today is overutilization, creating substantial cost without significant benefit. Further, the value of imaging is not easily defined, as imaging only affects outcomes indirectly, through interaction with treatment. Improving the quality, including appropriateness, of emergency imaging requires understanding of how imaging contributes to patient care. The six-tier efficacy hierarchy of Fryback and Thornbury enables understanding of the value of imaging on multiple levels, ranging from technical efficacy to medical decision-making and higher-level patient and societal outcomes. The imaging efficacy hierarchy also allows definition of imaging quality through the Institute of Medicine (IOM)'s quality domains of safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equitability and provides a foundation for quality improvement. In this article, the authors elucidate the Fryback and Thornbury framework to define the value of imaging in the ED and to relate emergency imaging to the IOM quality domains.
影像学检查对于急诊科患者的治疗至关重要。然而,如今许多用于急性病治疗的影像学检查存在过度使用的情况,在没有显著益处的情况下产生了大量成本。此外,影像学检查的价值并不容易界定,因为影像学检查只是通过与治疗的相互作用间接影响治疗结果。提高急诊影像学检查的质量,包括合理性,需要了解影像学检查如何为患者治疗做出贡献。弗莱巴克(Fryback)和索恩伯里(Thornbury)的六级效能层次结构有助于从多个层面理解影像学检查的价值,从技术效能到医疗决策以及更高层面的患者和社会结果。影像学效能层次结构还允许通过医学研究所(IOM)的安全、有效性、以患者为中心、及时性、效率和公平性等质量领域来定义影像学检查质量,并为质量改进提供了基础。在本文中,作者阐明了弗莱巴克和索恩伯里的框架,以界定急诊科影像学检查的价值,并将急诊影像学检查与医学研究所的质量领域联系起来。