Azadi-Schossig Parastu, Becker Klaus, Attin Thomas
Center of Dentistry, Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zürich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032, Zürich, CH, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1577-87. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1634-x. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
Citric acid (CA) is a component in beverages responsible for dental erosion. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of CA with different pH, titratable acid and buffer capacity (ß), and the impact of the chelating effect of CA on development of enamel erosions.
In a superfusion model, hydroxy apatite (HAp) dissolution of bovine enamel was measured in four experiments (EXP 1-4) with 27 experimental groups (n = 8 per group). The samples were superfused with different CA variations and respective controls. EXP-1: Dilution series of HCl (pH 2.15-3.02). EXP-2: Dilution series of natural CA (56-1.75 mmol l(-1); pH 2.15-3.02). EXP-3: CA solutions (56 and 14 mmol l(-1), ß: 39.7 and 10.2 mmol l(-1) pH(-1), respectively) with different titratable acidity at equal pH values. EXP-4: CA concentrations (56-1.75 mmol l(-1)) neutralized to pH 7.
CA led to higher HAp-dissolution than HCl. With higher pH, the difference in HAp-dissolution rate between the two acids became increasingly smaller. At equal pH, HAp-dissolution was higher for the CA with the higher amount of titratable acid. However, no clear correlation between erosion and titratable acid or ß could be found. Only minimal amounts of HAp were dissolved by neutralized CA compared to CA with natural pH.
Under the chosen conditions chelating effects of CA do not have a relevant influence of HAp-dissolution of enamel. Moreover, amount of HAp-dissolution by CA is not attributed to a single factor alone. The interplay between the different parameters of CA seems to be responsible for its erosive potential.
The erosive potential of solutions containing citric acid with unknown concentrations could not be predicted using a single parameter alone, and should at best determined in experimental set-ups.
柠檬酸(CA)是饮料中导致牙釉质侵蚀的一种成分。本研究旨在探讨不同pH值、可滴定酸和缓冲容量(ß)的CA的影响,以及CA的螯合作用对牙釉质侵蚀发展的影响。
在一个灌注模型中,在四个实验(实验1 - 4)中测量牛牙釉质的羟基磷灰石(HAp)溶解情况,共有27个实验组(每组n = 8)。用不同的CA变体和各自的对照物对样品进行灌注。实验1:盐酸的稀释系列(pH 2.15 - 3.02)。实验2:天然CA的稀释系列(56 - 1.75 mmol l(-1);pH 2.15 - 3.02)。实验3:在相同pH值下具有不同可滴定酸度的CA溶液(分别为56和14 mmol l(-1),ß:39.7和10.2 mmol l(-1) pH(-1))。实验4:中和至pH 7的CA浓度(56 - 1.75 mmol l(-1))。
CA导致的HAp溶解高于HCl。随着pH值升高,两种酸之间的HAp溶解速率差异越来越小。在相同pH值下,可滴定酸含量较高的CA的HAp溶解更高。然而,未发现侵蚀与可滴定酸或ß之间存在明确的相关性。与天然pH值的CA相比,中和后的CA仅溶解了极少量的HAp。
在所选条件下,CA的螯合作用对牙釉质的HAp溶解没有相关影响。此外,CA导致的HAp溶解量并非仅归因于单一因素。CA不同参数之间的相互作用似乎决定了其侵蚀潜力。
仅使用单一参数无法预测含未知浓度柠檬酸溶液的侵蚀潜力,最好在实验装置中进行测定。