Pellegrini Elisa, Falcone Lino, Loppi Stefano, Lorenzini Giacomo, Nali Cristina
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Monsanto Agricoltura Italia, Via Giovanni Spadolini 5, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Ecotoxicology. 2016 Mar;25(2):279-90. doi: 10.1007/s10646-015-1586-6. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
Many chemical and non-chemical strategies have been applied to control weeds in agricultural and industrial areas. Knowledge regarding the effects of these methods on roadside vegetation is still poor. A 2-year field experiment was performed along a road located near Livorno (Tuscany, central Italy). Eight plots/strips were identified, of which four were subjected to periodical mechanical mowing and the remaining four were treated with a chemical herbicide based on glyphosate (the producer's recommended rates were used for the selective control of broad-leaved weeds). Our results clearly showed that roadside soil and vegetation are a significant reservoir of anthropogenic activities which have a strong negative effect on several phytosociological, pedochemical and biological parameters. Compared with conventional mechanical mowing, chemical treatment induced (i) a significant increase in organic matter in the upper plot layers (+18%), and (ii) a marked reduction in weed height throughout the entire period of the experiment. Irrespectively of the kind of treatment, no significance differences were detected in terms of (i) biological quality of soil (the abundance and diversity of arthropod communities did not change), and (ii) plant elemental content (bulk concentrations of analysed trace elements had a good fit within ranges of occurrence in the "reference plant"). The glyphosate partially controlled broad-leaved weeds and this moderate efficacy is dependent upon the season/time of application. In conclusion, the rational and sustainable use of chemical herbicides may be a useful tool for the management of roadside vegetation.
许多化学和非化学策略已被应用于控制农业和工业区的杂草。关于这些方法对路边植被影响的知识仍然匮乏。在利沃诺(意大利中部托斯卡纳)附近的一条道路沿线进行了为期两年的田间试验。确定了8个地块/条带,其中4个进行定期机械割草,其余4个用基于草甘膦的化学除草剂处理(使用生产商推荐的剂量来选择性控制阔叶杂草)。我们的结果清楚地表明,路边土壤和植被是人为活动的重要储存库,对几个植物社会学、土壤化学和生物学参数有强烈的负面影响。与传统机械割草相比,化学处理导致:(i)上层地块土壤有机质显著增加(+18%),以及(ii)在整个试验期间杂草高度显著降低。无论采用何种处理方式,在(i)土壤生物质量方面(节肢动物群落的丰度和多样性没有变化)以及(ii)植物元素含量方面(分析的微量元素的总体浓度在“参考植物”的出现范围内拟合良好)均未检测到显著差异。草甘膦部分控制了阔叶杂草,这种适度的效果取决于施用季节/时间。总之,合理和可持续地使用化学除草剂可能是管理路边植被的有用工具。