Suppr超能文献

关于改善医生激励机制以实现更高价值医疗保健的政策导向研究。

Policy-Oriented Research on Improved Physician Incentives for Higher Value Health Care.

作者信息

Luft Harold S

机构信息

Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Ames Building, Palo Alto, CA 94301.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2187-215. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12423. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

Abstract

Policy makers (both public and private) are seeking ways to improve the value delivered within our health care system, that is, using fewer resources to provide the same benefit to patients, or using equivalent resources to provide more benefit. One strategy is to alter the predominant fee-for-service (FFS) economic incentives in the current system. To inform such policy changes, this paper identifies areas in which little is known about the effects of specific incentives (FFS, salary, etc.) on the two components of value: resource use and quality. Specific suggestions are offered regarding research that would be informative for policy makers, focusing on fundamental "building block" studies rather than overall evaluations of complex interventions, such as accountable care organizations. This research would better identify critical aspects of the FFS model and salary-based payments that are particularly problematic, as well as situations in which FFS or salary may be less problematic. The research would also explore when alternatives, such as episode-based payment might be feasible, or simply be hypothetical solutions. The availability of electronic health record-based data in various delivery systems would allow many of these studies to be accomplished in 3-5 years with budgets manageable by public and private funding sources.

摘要

政策制定者(包括公共部门和私营部门)正在寻求方法来提高我们医疗保健系统所提供的价值,也就是说,用更少的资源为患者提供相同的益处,或者用等量的资源提供更多的益处。一种策略是改变当前系统中占主导地位的按服务收费(FFS)经济激励措施。为了为这类政策变化提供依据,本文确定了一些领域,在这些领域中,对于特定激励措施(如按服务收费、薪资等)对价值的两个组成部分——资源使用和质量——的影响,我们了解甚少。针对对政策制定者有参考价值的研究提出了具体建议,重点是基础性的“基石”研究,而非对诸如 accountable care organizations 等复杂干预措施的全面评估。这项研究将更好地识别按服务收费模式和基于薪资支付中特别成问题的关键方面,以及按服务收费或薪资问题较少的情况。该研究还将探讨诸如基于诊疗期间的支付等替代方案何时可能可行,或者仅仅是假设性的解决方案。各种医疗服务提供系统中基于电子健康记录的数据的可用性将使许多此类研究能够在3至5年内完成,且预算在公共和私营资金来源可承受范围内。

相似文献

1
Policy-Oriented Research on Improved Physician Incentives for Higher Value Health Care.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2187-215. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12423. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
2
The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust.
JAMA. 1998 Nov 18;280(19):1708-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.19.1708.
3
Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives.
Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):149-77, III. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00202.
4
The alignment and blending of payment incentives within physician organizations.
Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1589-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00305.x.
5
The impact of physician payment methods on raising the efficiency of the healthcare system: an international comparison.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004;3(1):39-46. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200403010-00008.
8
Direct financial incentives in managed care: unanswered questions.
Health Matrix Clevel. 1996 Winter;6(1):53-88.
10
Fee-for-service will remain a feature of major payment reforms, requiring more changes in Medicare physician payment.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):1977-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0350.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidance of healthcare development for metastatic cancer patients as an example for setting incentives.
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2020 Feb;37(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s10585-019-10014-1.
2
Distribution of monetary incentives in health insurance scheme influences acupuncture treatment choices: An experimental study.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0218154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218154. eCollection 2019.
3
Introduction. Apple Pickers or Federal Judges: Strong versus Weak Incentives in Physician Payment.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2049-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12424.

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction. Apple Pickers or Federal Judges: Strong versus Weak Incentives in Physician Payment.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2049-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12424.
2
How Financial and Reputational Incentives Can Be Used to Improve Medical Care.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2090-115. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12419. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
3
Beyond Measurement and Reward: Methods of Motivating Quality Improvement and Accountability.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2155-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12413. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
The Theory of Value-Based Payment Incentives and Their Application to Health Care.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2057-89. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12408. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
6
Pioneer accountable care organizations: traversing rough country.
JAMA. 2015 Jun 2;313(21):2126-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5086.
7
Medicare annual preventive care visits: use increased among fee-for-service patients, but many do not participate.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):11-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0483.
8
Time of day and the decision to prescribe antibiotics.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):2029-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5225.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验