Gergely Ryan C R, Toohey Kathleen S, Jones Mary E, Small Scott R, Berend Michael E
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, 5500 Wabash Avenue, Terre Haute, Indiana, 47803.
JRSI Foundation, Inc., 1199 Hadley Road, Mooresville, Indiana, 46158.
J Orthop Res. 2016 Jun;34(6):915-23. doi: 10.1002/jor.23100. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
The mechanical properties and thermal history of polymethyl-methacrylate bone cement vary significantly with the preparation procedure used. Because the polymerization reaction is exothermic, many researchers have attempted to minimize thermal osteonecrosis due to heat generation by altering procedures in the preparation of the cement. In most previous studies, only one or two aspects of the preparation procedure were controlled, and there has been little research that comprehensively examines the effects of preparation on the cure kinetics and resulting properties of bone cement. In this study, cement viscosity, cement layer thickness, initial cement temperature, initial metal component temperature, and mixing method were varied to assess the effects on the cement. Maximum temperature, polymerization time, necrosis index, bending strength, and porosity were chosen to evaluate the different preparation procedures, where an optimal procedure would minimize necrosis, reduce cement cure time, and maximize bending strength. Design of Experiments (DOE) was used to examine the main effects and interactions of preparation techniques. Among the most prominent results, it was found that the cure kinetics and the related quantities are primarily controlled by the initial metal component temperature and that the bending strength is most dependent on the mixing method. For the two formulations studied, the optimum preparation procedures should keep cement and metal components at room temperature prior to mixing with a vacuum mixing system. Reducing cement mantle thickness may also be advantageous, as it reduces the maximum temperature and the risk of tissue damage. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:915-923, 2016.
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥的机械性能和热历史会因所采用的制备程序而有显著差异。由于聚合反应是放热反应,许多研究人员试图通过改变骨水泥制备程序来尽量减少因产热导致的热骨坏死。在大多数先前的研究中,仅控制了制备程序的一两个方面,而很少有研究全面考察制备对骨水泥固化动力学及最终性能的影响。在本研究中,改变了骨水泥粘度、骨水泥层厚度、初始骨水泥温度、初始金属部件温度以及混合方法,以评估其对骨水泥的影响。选择最高温度、聚合时间、坏死指数、弯曲强度和孔隙率来评估不同的制备程序,其中最佳程序应能使坏死最小化、缩短骨水泥固化时间并使弯曲强度最大化。采用实验设计(DOE)来考察制备技术的主要影响及相互作用。在最显著的结果中发现,固化动力学及相关量主要受初始金属部件温度控制,而弯曲强度最依赖于混合方法。对于所研究的两种配方而言,最佳制备程序应是在使用真空混合系统混合之前,将骨水泥和金属部件保持在室温。减小骨水泥套厚度可能也具有优势,因为这会降低最高温度及组织损伤风险。© 2015 骨科研究协会。由威利期刊公司出版。《矫形外科研究杂志》34:915 - 923,2016年。