Yousef Mohamed Abdelhamid Ali, Dionigi Paolo
Experimental Surgery and Microsurgery Research Unit, Clinical Surgical Science Department, University of Pavia, Viale Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy ; Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Unit, Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag, Egypt.
Experimental Surgery and Microsurgery Research Unit, Clinical Surgical Science Department, University of Pavia, Viale Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
J Hand Microsurg. 2015 Dec;7(2):256-60. doi: 10.1007/s12593-015-0196-0. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
There is great variability among microsurgeons as regards the use of prophylactic anticoagulant after revascularization and this is probably due to lack of comparative data. Also, there has been much debate regarding the benefit of anti-thrombotic therapies versus the risk of complications such as systemic bleeding and hematoma formation. To evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as a prophylactic anticoagulant therapy after microsurgical repair of the femoral artery and vein in rats. Randomized, blinded study. The femoral artery and vein of 40 Sprague Dawley rats were sectioned and repaired with microsurgical sutures under general anesthesia. They were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group (A) in which the 20 rats were injected with Enoxaparin subcutaneously at a dose 1.5 mg/kg once daily for 3 successive days; Group (B), the control group, in which 20 rats were injected with isotonic sodium chloride 0.9 % subcutaneously in a blinded fashion. After 7 days, the femoral vessels were re-explored and patency of the femoral vessels was assessed with empty-and-refill test. There were a total of 12 vascular thrombosis among 74 microsurgical repair in both groups with percentage of 16.22 % including, 5 arterial anastomosis and 7 venous anastomosis. The incidence of thrombosis in the treatment group (A) was 18.4 % while the incidence of thrombosis in the control group (B) was 13.8 %. This difference was not statistically significant using Fisher exact test. Postoperative administration of LMWH did not provide the desired protection against thrombosis after microsurgical vascular repair.
在血管再通后预防性抗凝剂的使用方面,显微外科医生之间存在很大差异,这可能是由于缺乏对比数据。此外,关于抗血栓治疗的益处与全身出血和血肿形成等并发症风险的争论也很多。为了评估术后低分子量肝素(LMWH)作为大鼠股动脉和静脉显微外科修复后预防性抗凝治疗的有效性。随机、盲法研究。40只Sprague Dawley大鼠的股动脉和静脉在全身麻醉下切断并用显微外科缝线修复。它们被随机分为2组:A组,20只大鼠皮下注射依诺肝素,剂量为1.5mg/kg,每天1次,连续3天;B组为对照组,20只大鼠以盲法皮下注射0.9%的等渗氯化钠。7天后,再次探查股血管,并用排空-再充盈试验评估股血管的通畅情况。两组74次显微外科修复中共有12次血管血栓形成,百分比为16.22%,其中动脉吻合口5处,静脉吻合口7处。治疗组(A)的血栓形成发生率为18.4%,而对照组(B)的血栓形成发生率为13.8%。使用Fisher精确检验,这种差异无统计学意义。显微外科血管修复术后给予LMWH并不能提供预期的抗血栓形成保护。