Simba Daudi, Kakoko Deodatus
Department of Community Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Tanzan J Health Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):89-95. doi: 10.4314/thrb.v14i2.1.
The World Health Organization aims at universal access to effective antimalarial treatment by the year 2015. Consequently, an enormous financial resource has been invested on Artemisinin Combination Therapy (ACT) subsidy. In Tanzania, strategies to increase access of artemether-lumufantrine (ALu) rural areas, where the burden is highest, includes subsidy to the Faith-based Organisations (FBO) facilities and accredited drug dispensing outlets (ADDOs). This study was done to assess the extent to which children suffering from malaria access ALu from the private sector in rural areas. A total of 1,235 under fives randomly selected from 12 rural villages were followed up at home on weekly basis for six months in Kilosa district in 2008. Using a structured questionnaire, caretakers were interviewed about the child's history of fever in the past 7 days; type of treatment given and the source. Baseline data were obtained on demographic characteristics, caretakers' knowledge about malaria and social economic indicators of the household. Of the 1,235 children followed-up, 740 care-seeking visits were recorded, of which, 264 (35.7%) were made at government health facilities and nearly a quarter (24.1%; 178/740) at ordinary shops that sell general merchandize including rice and sugar. Only 22% of the caretakers sought care from FBO and ADDOs. While 686 (86.6%) of the episodes were treated with antimalarials, only 319 (43%) received ALu, the recommended antimalarial. Majority (83%) of the visits made at government facilities were prescribed with ALu compared to less than half who went to FBO facilities (40.0%) and ADDOs (25.0%). In conclusion, this study has shown that less than a quarter of fever episodes suspected to be malaria in rural areas were made at FBO facilities and ADDOs, of which, less than half were treated with ALu. This shows that ALu subsidy to formal private sector does not adequately reach children in rural areas, where the malaria burden is highest. This cast some doubts if the target of universal access to effective antimalarial, by 2015, will be reached. There is need to consider enlisting the services of community health workers in the efforts to improve access to ALu in rural areas. Further research is needed to explore providers' / dispensers' preference for non-recommended antimalarials in the private sector and caretakers' preference for ordinary shops.
世界卫生组织的目标是到2015年实现有效抗疟治疗的普遍可及。因此,已投入大量资金用于青蒿素联合疗法(ACT)补贴。在坦桑尼亚,为增加负担最重的农村地区蒿甲醚-本芴醇(ALu)的可及性所采取的策略包括向基于信仰的组织(FBO)设施和经认可的药品零售点(ADDOs)提供补贴。本研究旨在评估农村地区患疟疾儿童从私营部门获取ALu的程度。2008年,在基洛萨区从12个农村村庄随机选取了1235名五岁以下儿童,在家中进行了为期六个月的每周随访。使用结构化问卷,就儿童过去7天的发热史、接受的治疗类型及治疗来源对看护人进行了访谈。获取了关于人口统计学特征、看护人对疟疾的了解以及家庭社会经济指标的基线数据。在接受随访的1235名儿童中,记录到740次寻求治疗的就诊,其中264次(35.7%)是在政府卫生设施进行的,近四分之一(24.1%;178/740)是在出售包括大米和糖等一般商品的普通商店进行的。只有22%的看护人从FBO和ADDOs寻求治疗。虽然686次(86.6%)发病接受了抗疟治疗,但只有319次(43%)接受了推荐的抗疟药ALu。在政府设施进行的就诊中,大多数(83%)被开了ALu,而去FBO设施(40.0%)和ADDOs(25.0%)的人中接受ALu治疗的不到一半。总之,本研究表明,农村地区疑似疟疾的发热病例中,不到四分之一是在FBO设施和ADDOs进行治疗的,其中不到一半接受了ALu治疗。这表明对正规私营部门的ALu补贴未能充分惠及疟疾负担最重的农村地区儿童。这使人怀疑到2015年实现普遍可及有效抗疟药这一目标是否能够达成。有必要考虑在改善农村地区ALu可及性的努力中争取社区卫生工作者的服务。需要进一步研究以探究私营部门提供者/药剂师对非推荐抗疟药的偏好以及看护人对普通商店的偏好。