Rhodes Nathaniel J, O'Donnell J Nicholas, Lizza Bryan D, McLaughlin Milena M, Esterly John S, Scheetz Marc H
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Nov 23;60(2):838-44. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01564-15. Print 2016 Feb.
Increasingly, infectious disease studies employ tree-based approaches, e.g., classification and regression tree modeling, to identify clinical thresholds. We present tree-based-model-derived thresholds along with their measures of uncertainty. We explored individual and pooled clinical cohorts of bacteremic patients to identify modified acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (II) (m-APACHE-II) score mortality thresholds using a tree-based approach. Predictive performance measures for each candidate threshold were calculated. Candidate thresholds were examined according to binary logistic regression probabilities of the primary outcome, correct classification predictive matrices, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Three individual cohorts comprising a total of 235 patients were studied. Within the pooled cohort, the mean (± standard deviation) m-APACHE-II score was 13.6 ± 5.3, with an in-hospital mortality of 16.6%. The probability of death was greater at higher m-APACHE II scores in only one of three cohorts (odds ratio for cohort 1 [OR1] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.99 to 1.34; OR2 = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.16; OR3 = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.38) and was greater at higher scores within the pooled cohort (OR4 = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.19). In contrast, tree-based models overcame power constraints and identified m-APACHE-II thresholds for mortality in two of three cohorts (P = 0.02, 0.1, and 0.008) and the pooled cohort (P = 0.001). Predictive performance at each threshold was highly variable among cohorts. The selection of any one predictive threshold value resulted in fixed sensitivity and specificity. Tree-based models increased power and identified threshold values from continuous predictor variables; however, sample size and data distributions influenced the identified thresholds. The provision of predictive matrices or graphical displays of predicted probabilities within infectious disease studies can improve the interpretation of tree-based model-derived thresholds.
传染病研究越来越多地采用基于树的方法,例如分类和回归树建模,来确定临床阈值。我们提出了基于树模型得出的阈值及其不确定性度量。我们探索了菌血症患者的个体和汇总临床队列,以使用基于树的方法确定改良急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(II)(m-APACHE-II)评分的死亡率阈值。计算了每个候选阈值的预测性能指标。根据主要结局的二元逻辑回归概率、正确分类预测矩阵和受试者工作特征曲线对候选阈值进行了检验。研究了三个个体队列,共235名患者。在汇总队列中,m-APACHE-II评分的平均值(±标准差)为13.6±5.3,住院死亡率为16.6%。仅在三个队列中的一个队列中,m-APACHE II评分越高,死亡概率越高(队列1的优势比[OR1]=1.15,95%置信区间[CI]=0.99至1.34;OR2=1.04,95%CI=0.94至1.16;OR3=1.18,95%CI=1.02至1.38),而在汇总队列中,评分越高死亡概率越高(OR4=1.11,95%CI=1.04至1.19)。相比之下,基于树的模型克服了效能限制,在三个队列中的两个队列(P=0.02、0.1和0.008)以及汇总队列(P=0.001)中确定了m-APACHE-II死亡率阈值。各队列中每个阈值的预测性能差异很大。选择任何一个预测阈值都会导致固定的敏感性和特异性。基于树的模型提高了效能,并从连续预测变量中确定了阈值;然而,样本量和数据分布会影响所确定的阈值。在传染病研究中提供预测矩阵或预测概率的图形显示可以改善对基于树模型得出的阈值的解释。