Zhang Dongfeng, Shen Xiaoli, Qi Xin
Departments of Epidemiology and Health Statistics (Zhang, Shen), and Clinical Medicine (Qi), Medical College of Qingdao University, Shandong, China
Departments of Epidemiology and Health Statistics (Zhang, Shen), and Clinical Medicine (Qi), Medical College of Qingdao University, Shandong, China.
CMAJ. 2016 Feb 16;188(3):E53-E63. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150535. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
Data on resting heart rate and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality are inconsistent; the magnitude of associations between resting heart rate and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality varies across studies. We performed a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to quantitatively evaluate the associations in the general population.
We searched PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE from inception to Jan. 1, 2015. We used a random-effects model to combine study-specific relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used restricted cubic spline functions to assess the dose-response relation.
A total of 46 studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1 246 203 patients and 78 349 deaths for all-cause mortality, and 848 320 patients and 25 800 deaths for cardiovascular mortality. The relative risk with 10 beats/min increment of resting heart rate was 1.09 (95% CI 1.07-1.12) for all-cause mortality and 1.08 (95% CI 1.06-1.10) for cardiovascular mortality. Compared with the lowest category, patients with a resting heart rate of 60-80 beats/min had a relative risk of 1.12 (95% CI 1.07-1.17) for all-cause mortality and 1.08 (95% CI 0.99-1.17) for cardiovascular mortality, and those with a resting heart rate of greater than 80 beats/min had a relative risk of 1.45 (95% CI 1.34-1.57) for all-cause mortality and 1.33 (95% CI 1.19-1.47) for cardiovascular mortality. Overall, the results did not differ after adjustment for traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Compared with 45 beats/min, the risk of all-cause mortality increased significantly with increasing resting heart rate in a linear relation, but a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality was observed at 90 beats/min. Substantial heterogeneity and publication bias were detected.
Higher resting heart rate was independently associated with increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. This indicates that resting heart rate is a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population.
静息心率与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率风险之间的数据并不一致;静息心率与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率风险之间关联的程度在不同研究中有所不同。我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析,以定量评估一般人群中的这些关联。
我们检索了从数据库建立至2015年1月1日的PubMed、Embase和MEDLINE。我们使用随机效应模型来合并各研究的相对风险和95%置信区间(CI)。我们使用受限立方样条函数来评估剂量反应关系。
共有46项研究纳入荟萃分析,其中全因死亡率涉及1246203例患者和78349例死亡,心血管死亡率涉及848320例患者和25800例死亡。静息心率每增加10次/分钟,全因死亡率的相对风险为1.09(95%CI 1.07 - 1.12),心血管死亡率的相对风险为1.08(95%CI 1.06 - 1.10)。与最低类别相比,静息心率为60 - 80次/分钟的患者全因死亡率的相对风险为1.12(95%CI 1.07 - 1.17),心血管死亡率的相对风险为1.08(95%CI 0.99 - 1.17);静息心率大于80次/分钟的患者全因死亡率的相对风险为1.45(95%CI 1.34 - 1.57),心血管死亡率的相对风险为1.33(95%CI 1.19 - 1.47)。总体而言,在对心血管疾病传统危险因素进行调整后,结果并无差异。与45次/分钟相比,全因死亡率风险随静息心率增加呈线性显著增加,但在静息心率为90次/分钟时观察到心血管死亡率风险显著增加。检测到显著的异质性和发表偏倚。
静息心率较高与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率风险增加独立相关。这表明静息心率是一般人群全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的一个预测指标。