Shi Leiyu, Makinen Marty, Lee De-Chih, Kidane Ruth, Blanchet Nathan, Liang Hailun, Li Jinghua, Lindelow Magnus, Wang Hong, Xie Shuangbao, Wu Jian
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA.
Results for Development Institute, 1100 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA.
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 30;14:98. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0221-8.
This study examined the impact of an Integrated Care Delivery intervention on health care seeking and outcomes for chronically-ill patients in Henan province, China.
A case-control study was carried out in six health care organizations from two counties in Henan province, China. 371 patients aged 50 years or over with hypertension or diabetes who visited either community health centers or hospitals in the Intervention or Control Counties were systematically selected and surveyed on health care seeking behavior, quality of care, and pathway of care for their major chronic condition. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare quality and value of care indicators between patients from the Intervention and Control Counties. Multivariate analyses were used to confirm these associations after controlling for patients' demographic and health characteristics.
Patients in both the Intervention and Control Counties chose their current health care providers primarily out of concern for quality of care (provider expertise and adequate medical equipment) and patient-centered care. Compared with the patients from the Control County, those from the Intervention County performed significantly better on almost all the quality and value of care indicators even after controlling for patients' demographic and health characteristics. Significant associations between types of health care facilities and quality as well as value of care were also observed.
The study showed that the Integrated Care Delivery Model was critical in guiding patients' health care seeking behavior and associated with improved accessibility, continuity, coordination and comprehensiveness of care, as well as reducing health inequities and mitigating disparities for older patients with chronic conditions.
本研究探讨了综合医疗服务提供干预措施对中国河南省慢性病患者就医行为及治疗效果的影响。
在中国河南省两个县的六个医疗机构开展了一项病例对照研究。系统选取了371名年龄在50岁及以上、患有高血压或糖尿病的患者,这些患者来自干预县或对照县的社区卫生中心或医院,对他们的就医行为、医疗质量及主要慢性病的治疗路径进行了调查。进行双变量分析以比较干预县和对照县患者之间的医疗质量和价值指标。在控制患者的人口统计学和健康特征后,使用多变量分析来确认这些关联。
干预县和对照县的患者选择当前的医疗服务提供者主要是出于对医疗质量(提供者专业知识和充足的医疗设备)和以患者为中心的医疗服务的关注。与对照县的患者相比,即使在控制了患者的人口统计学和健康特征后,干预县的患者在几乎所有医疗质量和价值指标上的表现都明显更好。还观察到医疗设施类型与医疗质量和价值之间存在显著关联。
该研究表明,综合医疗服务提供模式对于指导患者的就医行为至关重要,并且与改善医疗服务的可及性、连续性、协调性和全面性相关,同时还能减少健康不平等现象,减轻老年慢性病患者之间的差异。