Chima S C, Mamdoo F
Programme of Bio and Research Ethics and Medical Law, School of Nursing and Public Health and Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;18 Suppl:S31-9. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.170820.
Termination of pregnancy (TOP) or feticide for severe fetal anomalies is ethically and morally challenging and maybe considered illegal in countries with restrictive abortion laws. While diagnostic modalities such as fetal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and genetic screening have improved prenatal diagnosis, these technologies remain scarce in many African countries making diagnosis and counseling regarding TOP difficult. Ethical dilemmas such as women's autonomy rights may conflict with fetus' right to personhood, and doctor's moral obligations to society. In liberal jurisdictions, previable fetuses may not have legal rights of personhood; therefore, appropriate action would be to respect pregnant women's decisions regarding TOP. However, in countries with restrictive abortion laws the fetus maybe imbued with the right of personhood at conception, making TOP illegal and exposing doctors and patients to potential criminal prosecution. Birth of a severely disabled baby with independent legal rights creates further conflicts between parents and clinicians complicating healthcare decision-making. Irrespective of the maternal decision to accept or refuse TOP, the psychological and emotional impact of an impaired fetus or neonate, often lead to moral distress and posttraumatic stress reactions in parents. Doctors have legal and ethical obligations to provide an accurate antenatal diagnosis with full disclosure to enable informed decision making. Failure to provide timely or accurate diagnosis may lead to allegations of negligence with potential liability for "wrongful birth" or "wrongful life" following birth of severely disabled babies. Mismanagement of such cases also causes misuse of scarce healthcare resources in resource-poor countries. This paper describes ethical challenges in clinical management of two neonates born following declined and failed feticide for severe central nervous system anomalies with a critical appraisal of the relevant literature.
对于严重胎儿畸形进行妊娠终止(TOP)或杀胎在伦理和道德上具有挑战性,在堕胎法律严格的国家可能被视为非法。虽然胎儿超声、磁共振成像和基因筛查等诊断手段改善了产前诊断,但这些技术在许多非洲国家仍然匮乏,使得TOP的诊断和咨询变得困难。诸如妇女自主权等伦理困境可能与胎儿的人格权以及医生对社会的道德义务相冲突。在自由司法管辖区,未达到可存活阶段的胎儿可能没有法律人格权;因此,适当的做法是尊重孕妇关于TOP的决定。然而,在堕胎法律严格的国家,胎儿在受孕时可能被赋予人格权,使得TOP非法,并使医生和患者面临潜在的刑事起诉。出生具有独立法律权利的严重残疾婴儿会在父母和临床医生之间引发进一步冲突,使医疗决策复杂化。无论母亲决定接受还是拒绝TOP,受损胎儿或新生儿的心理和情感影响,往往会导致父母出现道德困扰和创伤后应激反应。医生有法律和道德义务提供准确的产前诊断并充分披露信息,以促成明智的决策。未能提供及时或准确的诊断可能导致疏忽指控,并在严重残疾婴儿出生后面临“错误出生”或“错误生命”的潜在责任。在资源匮乏的国家,此类病例的管理不善还会导致稀缺医疗资源的滥用。本文描述了在因严重中枢神经系统异常而终止妊娠失败后出生的两名新生儿临床管理中的伦理挑战,并对相关文献进行了批判性评估。