Suppr超能文献

冷冻疗法、环形电切术及冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的获益与危害的系统评价和荟萃分析

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

作者信息

Santesso Nancy, Mustafa Reem A, Wiercioch Wojtek, Kehar Rohan, Gandhi Shreyas, Chen Yaolong, Cheung Adrienne, Hopkins Jessica, Khatib Rasha, Ma Bin, Mustafa Ahmad A, Lloyd Nancy, Wu Darong, Broutet Nathalie, Schünemann Holger J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Departments of Internal Medicine/Nephrology and Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) stage 2-3 is a premalignant lesion that can progress to cervical cancer in 10-20 years if untreated.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct systematic reviews of randomized and nonrandomized studies for effects of cryotherapy, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), and cold knife conization (CKC) as treatment for CIN 2-3.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Medline, Embase, and other databases were searched to February 2012 for benefits, and to July 2012 for harms. Additionally, experts were contacted. Keywords for CIN, cervical cancer, and the treatments were used.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies of nonpregnant women 18 years or older not previously treated for CIN were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two investigators independently screened and collected data. Relative risks and proportions were calculated and evidence assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).

MAIN RESULTS

Recurrence rate was 5.3% 12 months after cryotherapy or LEEP, and 1.4% after CKC. There seemed to be little or no differences in frequency of complications after LEEP or cryotherapy, but they occurred more often after CKC. Evidence suggests premature delivery is most common with CKC, but it also occurs after LEEP and cryotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a comprehensive search, there is very low quality evidence and often no evidence for important outcomes, including reproductive outcomes and complications. Studies assessing these outcomes are needed.

摘要

背景

宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2 - 3级是一种癌前病变,如果不治疗,10 - 20年后可能进展为宫颈癌。

目的

对冷冻疗法、环形电切术(LEEP)和冷刀锥切术(CKC)治疗CIN 2 - 3的随机和非随机研究进行系统评价。

检索策略

检索了Medline、Embase和其他数据库,截至2012年2月查找益处相关内容,截至2012年7月查找危害相关内容。此外,还联系了专家。使用了CIN、宫颈癌及相关治疗的关键词。

入选标准

纳入年龄在18岁及以上、未曾接受过CIN治疗的非妊娠女性的研究。

数据收集与分析

两名研究者独立筛选并收集数据。计算相对风险和比例,并使用GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定和评价)对证据进行评估。

主要结果

冷冻疗法或LEEP术后12个月复发率为5.3%,CKC术后为1.4%。LEEP或冷冻疗法后并发症发生率似乎几乎没有差异,但CKC后并发症更常见。有证据表明,CKC术后早产最常见,但LEEP和冷冻疗法后也会发生。

结论

尽管进行了全面检索,但关于包括生殖结局和并发症在内的重要结局的证据质量非常低,且往往缺乏证据。需要开展评估这些结局的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验