Suppr超能文献

[旋髂深动脉髂骨瓣移植与股方肌骨瓣移植治疗中青年Garden III/IV型股骨颈骨折的病例对照研究]

[Case-control study on the iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery and quadratus femoris bone flap transplantation for the treatment of Garden III/IV femoral neck fracture of young and middle-aged patients].

作者信息

Zhang Xue-quan, Fan Shi-cai, Li Hui-jin, Xie Yan-hua, Luo Peng-gang

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Sep;28(9):802-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effects between hip anterior S-P approach combined with iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery and posterior K-L approach combined with quadratus femoris bone flap transplantation for the treatment of femoral neck fracture of Garden III-IV in young and middle-aged patients.

METHODS

From January 2004 to January 2011,46 patients with femoral neck fractures were treated by two kinds of operation. Among them, 20 cases were treated with anterior S-P approach combined with iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery, included 12 males and 8 females with an average age of (32.1 ± 7.3) years old, involved 12 cases of Garden III and 8 cases of Garden IV. The other 26 cases were treated with posterior K-L approach combined with quadratus femoris bone flap transplantation, included 20 males and 6 females with an average age of (37.8 ± 6.9) years old, involved 16 cases of Garden III and 10 cases of Garden IV. The index of hospitalization (hospitalization time, total cost, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications), the quality index of operation (fracture reduction, position of internal fixation, fracture healing time, nonunion and femoral head necrosis) of two groups were observed and compared. Hip joint function were evaluated by Harris score.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up from 28 to 41 months with an average of 36 months. The intraoperative blood loss of group S-P (92.3 ± 10.4) ml was less than that of group K-L (132.4 ± 11.2) ml, there was significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05). The operation time of group S-P (81.4 ± 9.2) min was more than that of group K-L (67.1 ± 4.5) min, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). One case in group S-P and 9 cases in group K-L appeared postoperative complications, there was significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time of S-P group (83.5 ± 7.3) d was shorter than that of group K-L (103.2 ± 12.6) d, there was significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05). At 30 months after operation, there were significant difference in Harris scoring between two groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Anterior S-P approach combined with iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery for treatment of femoral neck fracture of Garden III-IV of young and middle-aged patients, it has characteristics in clear anatomic and easy to operate. As compared with K-L approach, S-P approach can better reserve residual blood supply of femoral neck. While combining with the iliac bone flap transplantation with deep circumflex iliac artery, it could better reconstruct the blood supply of femoral neck to promote fracture healing.

摘要

目的

比较髋前S-P入路联合旋髂深动脉髂骨瓣移植与髋后K-L入路联合股方肌骨瓣移植治疗中青年GardenⅢ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。

方法

2004年1月至2011年1月,采用两种手术方法治疗46例股骨颈骨折患者。其中,20例行髋前S-P入路联合旋髂深动脉髂骨瓣移植,男12例,女8例,平均年龄(32.1±7.3)岁,GardenⅢ型12例,GardenⅣ型8例。另外26例行髋后K-L入路联合股方肌骨瓣移植,男20例,女6例,平均年龄(37.8±6.9)岁,GardenⅢ型16例,GardenⅣ型10例。观察比较两组的住院指标(住院时间、总费用、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症)、手术质量指标(骨折复位、内固定位置、骨折愈合时间、骨不连及股骨头坏死)。采用Harris评分评估髋关节功能。

结果

所有患者随访28~41个月,平均36个月。S-P组术中出血量(92.3±10.4)ml少于K-L组(132.4±11.2)ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。S-P组手术时间(81.4±9.2)min多于K-L组(67.1±4.5)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。S-P组有1例出现术后并发症,K-L组有9例出现术后并发症,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。S-P组骨折愈合时间(83.5±7.3)d短于K-L组(103.2±12.6)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后30个月时,两组Harris评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

髋前S-P入路联合旋髂深动脉髂骨瓣移植治疗中青年GardenⅢ-Ⅳ型股骨颈骨折,具有解剖清晰、操作简便的特点。与K-L入路相比,S-P入路能更好地保留股骨颈残余血供。联合旋髂深动脉髂骨瓣移植,能更好地重建股骨颈血供,促进骨折愈合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验