Clinical Child and Family Studies, VU University Amsterdam.
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary.
Psychol Bull. 2016 Apr;142(4):337-366. doi: 10.1037/bul0000038. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
Twenty years ago, meta-analytic results (k = 19) confirmed the association between caregiver attachment representations and child-caregiver attachment (Van IJzendoorn, 1995). A test of caregiver sensitivity as the mechanism behind this intergenerational transmission showed an intriguing "transmission gap." Since then, the intergenerational transmission of attachment and the transmission gap have been studied extensively, and now extend to diverse populations from all over the globe. Two decades later, the current review revisited the effect sizes of intergenerational transmission, the heterogeneity of the transmission effects, and the size of the transmission gap. Analyses were carried out with a total of 95 samples (total N = 4,819). All analyses confirmed intergenerational transmission of attachment, with larger effect sizes for secure-autonomous transmission (r = .31) than for unresolved transmission (r = .21), albeit with significantly smaller effect sizes than 2 decades earlier (r = .47 and r = .31, respectively). Effect sizes were moderated by risk status of the sample, biological relatedness of child-caregiver dyads, and age of the children. Multivariate moderator analyses showed that unpublished and more recent studies had smaller effect sizes than published and older studies. Path analyses showed that the transmission could not be fully explained by caregiver sensitivity, with more recent studies narrowing but not bridging the "transmission gap." Implications for attachment theory as well as future directions for research are discussed.
二十年前,荟萃分析结果(k=19)证实了照顾者依恋表征与儿童-照顾者依恋之间的关联(Van IJzendoorn,1995)。一项关于照顾者敏感性作为这种代际传递背后机制的测试显示出了有趣的“传递缺口”。从那时起,依恋的代际传递和传递缺口就被广泛研究,现在已经扩展到来自全球各地的不同人群。二十年后,当前的综述重新审视了代际传递的效应大小、传递效应的异质性以及传递缺口的大小。总共对 95 个样本(总 N=4819)进行了分析。所有分析都证实了依恋的代际传递,安全自主传递(r=.31)的效应量大于未解决传递(r=.21),尽管与 20 年前相比,效应量明显较小(r=.47 和 r=.31)。效应量受到样本风险状况、儿童照顾者对的生物学相关性以及儿童年龄的调节。多变量调节分析表明,未发表的和较新的研究的效应量较小,而发表的和较旧的研究的效应量较大。路径分析表明,传递不能完全用照顾者敏感性来解释,最近的研究缩小了但没有弥合“传递缺口”。讨论了对依恋理论的影响以及未来研究的方向。