Guo Hongbo, Liu Sujing, Guo Jun, Li Bobo, Li Wanhu, Lu Zuowei, Sun Jujie, Zhang Baijiang, Yu Jinming
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Cancer Lett. 2016 Feb 28;371(2):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.11.038. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and the interpretation of its results. Based on the criterion of using ROSE or not, 236 patients with known or suspected lung cancer undergoing EBUS-TBNA were allocated into the ROSE group (122 patients with 252 lymph nodes) and non-ROSE group (114 patients with 260 lymph nodes). In the ROSE group, the percentages of the suspicious specimens on cytology and non-diagnostic specimens on pathology were both significantly lower than that in the non-ROSE group (8.7% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.038; and 0.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.018, respectively), and 13 out of 22 suspicious lesions on ROSE were confirmed with definite diagnoses on TBNA pathology. The diagnostic yield stratified by pathology was significantly higher in the ROSE group than that in the non-ROSE group (90.5% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.003). These results suggest that ROSE during EBUS-TBNA allows for a low rate of suspicious results and therefore improves the diagnostic yield stratified by pathology when sampling hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with lung cancer.
本研究的目的是评估快速现场评估(ROSE)在支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)过程中的实用性及其结果解读。根据是否使用ROSE的标准,将236例已知或疑似肺癌且接受EBUS-TBNA的患者分为ROSE组(122例患者,252个淋巴结)和非ROSE组(114例患者,260个淋巴结)。在ROSE组中,细胞学检查可疑标本的百分比和病理学检查非诊断性标本的百分比均显著低于非ROSE组(分别为8.7%对14.6%,p = 0.038;0.9%对4.4%,p = 0.018),ROSE检查的22个可疑病变中有13个在TBNA病理学检查中得到明确诊断。按病理学分层的诊断率在ROSE组显著高于非ROSE组(90.5%对81.2%,p = 0.003)。这些结果表明,在EBUS-TBNA过程中使用ROSE可使可疑结果率降低,因此在对肺癌患者的肺门或纵隔淋巴结病变进行采样时,可提高按病理学分层的诊断率。