Gizzo Salvatore, Noventa Marco, Vitagliano Amerigo, Dall'Asta Andrea, D'Antona Donato, Aldrich Clive J, Quaranta Michela, Frusca Tiziana, Patrelli Tito Silvio
Department of Woman and Child Health - University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - NHS Trust - Northampton General Hospital- Northampton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144334. eCollection 2015.
Several trials aimed at evaluating the efficacy of maternal hydration (MH) in increasing amniotic-fluid-volume (AFV) in pregnancies with isolated oligohydramnios or normohydramnos have been conducted. Unfortunately, no evidences support this intervention in routine-clinical-practice. The aim of this systematic-literature-review and meta-analysis was to collect all data regarding proposed strategies and their efficacy in relation to each clinical condition for which MH-therapy was performed with the aim of increasing amniotic-fluid (AF) and improving perinatal outcomes.
A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic-database MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane-Library in the time interval between 1991 and 2014. Following the identification of eligible trials, we estimated the methodological quality of each study (using QADAS-2) and clustered patients according to the following outcome measures: route of administration (oral versus intravenous versus combined), total daily dose of fluids administered (<2000 versus >2000), duration of hydration therapy: (1 day, >1 day but <1 week, >1 week), type of fluid administered (isotonic versus hypotonic versus combination).
In isolated-oligohydramnios (IO), maternal oral hydration is more effective than intravenous hydration and hypotonic solutions superior to isotonic solutions. The improvement in AFV appears to be time-dependent rather than daily-dose dependent. Regarding normohydramnios pregnancies, all strategies seem equivalent though the administration of hypotonic-fluid appears to have a slightly greater effect than isotonic-fluid. Regarding perinatal outcomes, data is fragmentary and heterogeneous and does not allow us to define the real clinical utility of MH.
Available data suggests that MH may be a safe, well-tolerated and useful strategy to improve AFV especially in cases of IO. In view of the numerous obstetric situations in which a reduced AFV may pose a threat, particularly to the fetus, the possibility of increasing AFV with a simple and inexpensive practice like MH-therapy may have potential clinical applications. Considering the various strategies of maternal hydration implemented in the treatment of IO, better results were observed when treatment was based on a combination of intravenous (for a period of 1 day) and oral (for a period of at least 14 days) hypotonic fluids (≥2000ml).
已经开展了多项试验,旨在评估母体补液(MH)对单纯羊水过少或羊水正常的妊娠中增加羊水量(AFV)的疗效。遗憾的是,没有证据支持在常规临床实践中采用这种干预措施。本系统文献综述和荟萃分析的目的是收集所有关于所提出策略及其在进行MH治疗以增加羊水(AF)和改善围产期结局的每种临床情况下的疗效的数据。
在1991年至2014年期间,对电子数据库MEDLINE、EMBASE、ScienceDirect和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。在确定符合条件的试验后,我们评估了每项研究的方法学质量(使用QADAS-2),并根据以下结局指标对患者进行分类:给药途径(口服与静脉注射与联合)、每日补液总量(<2000与>2000)、补液治疗持续时间(1天、>1天但<1周、>1周)、所补液的类型(等渗与低渗与混合)。
在单纯羊水过少(IO)中,母体口服补液比静脉补液更有效,低渗溶液优于等渗溶液。AFV的改善似乎与时间有关,而不是与每日剂量有关。对于羊水正常的妊娠,所有策略似乎等效,尽管给予低渗液似乎比给予等渗液的效果稍好。关于围产期结局,数据零散且异质性大,无法让我们确定MH的实际临床效用。
现有数据表明,MH可能是一种安全、耐受性良好且有用的改善AFV的策略,尤其是在IO病例中。鉴于羊水过少可能对众多产科情况,特别是对胎儿构成威胁,像MH治疗这样简单且廉价的方法来增加AFV的可能性可能具有潜在的临床应用价值。考虑到在治疗IO时实施的各种母体补液策略,当治疗基于静脉注射(持续1天)和口服(至少持续14天)低渗液(≥2000ml)联合使用时,观察到了更好的效果。