Bigdeli Tim B, Ripke Stephan, Bacanu Silviu-Alin, Lee Sang Hong, Wray Naomi R, Gejman Pablo V, Rietschel Marcella, Cichon Sven, St Clair David, Corvin Aiden, Kirov George, McQuillin Andrew, Gurling Hugh, Rujescu Dan, Andreassen Ole A, Werge Thomas, Blackwood Douglas H R, Pato Carlos N, Pato Michele T, Malhotra Anil K, O'Donovan Michael C, Kendler Kenneth S, Fanous Ayman H
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2016 Mar;171B(2):276-89. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32402. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of schizophrenia have yielded more than 100 common susceptibility variants, and strongly support a substantial polygenic contribution of a large number of small allelic effects. It has been hypothesized that familial schizophrenia is largely a consequence of inherited rather than environmental factors. We investigated the extent to which familiality of schizophrenia is associated with enrichment for common risk variants detectable in a large GWAS. We analyzed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for cases reporting a family history of psychotic illness (N = 978), cases reporting no such family history (N = 4,503), and unscreened controls (N = 8,285) from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC1) study of schizophrenia. We used a multinomial logistic regression approach with model-fitting to detect allelic effects specific to either family history subgroup. We also considered a polygenic model, in which we tested whether family history positive subjects carried more schizophrenia risk alleles than family history negative subjects, on average. Several individual SNPs attained suggestive but not genome-wide significant association with either family history subgroup. Comparison of genome-wide polygenic risk scores based on GWAS summary statistics indicated a significant enrichment for SNP effects among family history positive compared to family history negative cases (Nagelkerke's R(2 ) = 0.0021; P = 0.00331; P-value threshold <0.4). Estimates of variability in disease liability attributable to the aggregate effect of genome-wide SNPs were significantly greater for family history positive compared to family history negative cases (0.32 and 0.22, respectively; P = 0.031). We found suggestive evidence of allelic effects detectable in large GWAS of schizophrenia that might be specific to particular family history subgroups. However, consideration of a polygenic risk score indicated a significant enrichment among family history positive cases for common allelic effects. Familial illness might, therefore, represent a more heritable form of schizophrenia, as suggested by previous epidemiological studies.
精神分裂症的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经发现了100多个常见的易感性变异,并有力地支持了大量小等位基因效应的实质性多基因贡献。据推测,家族性精神分裂症在很大程度上是遗传因素而非环境因素的结果。我们调查了精神分裂症的家族性与在大型GWAS中可检测到的常见风险变异富集之间的关联程度。我们分析了来自精神疾病基因组学联盟(PGC1)精神分裂症研究中报告有精神病家族史的病例(N = 978)、报告无此类家族史的病例(N = 4,503)和未筛查对照(N = 8,285)的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)数据。我们使用多项逻辑回归方法和模型拟合来检测特定于每个家族史亚组的等位基因效应。我们还考虑了一个多基因模型,在该模型中我们测试家族史阳性的受试者平均是否比家族史阴性的受试者携带更多的精神分裂症风险等位基因。几个个体SNP与任一家族史亚组达到了提示性但未达到全基因组显著的关联。基于GWAS汇总统计数据的全基因组多基因风险评分比较表明,与家族史阴性病例相比,家族史阳性病例中的SNP效应显著富集(Nagelkerke's R(2) = 0.0021;P = 0.00331;P值阈值<0.4)。与家族史阴性病例相比,家族史阳性病例中可归因于全基因组SNP总体效应的疾病易感性变异估计值显著更高(分别为0.32和0.22;P = 0.031)。我们发现了在精神分裂症的大型GWAS中可检测到的等位基因效应的提示性证据,这些效应可能特定于特定的家族史亚组。然而,考虑多基因风险评分表明,在家族史阳性病例中常见等位基因效应显著富集。因此,如先前的流行病学研究所暗示的,家族性疾病可能代表精神分裂症更具遗传性的形式。