Roos Anna Marie, Boantza Victor D
Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2015 Dec 20;69(4):373-94. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2014.0066.
Our essay analyses a little-known book, Observations sur les eaux minerales des plusieurs provinces de France (1675), which is a study of French mineral waters, commissioned by and conducted at the French Royal Academy of Science (est. 1666). Its author, Samuel Cottereau Duclos (1598-1685), was a senior founding figure of the Academy, its chief chymist and one of its most influential members. We examine Observations with a focus on the changing attitudes towards chymical knowledge and practice in the French Academy and the Royal Society of London in the period 1666-84. Chymistry was a fundamental analytical tool for seventeenth-century natural historians, and, as the work of Lawrence Principe and William Newman has shown, it is central to understanding the 'long' Scientific Revolution. Much study has also been done on the developing norms of openness in the dissemination and presentation of scientific, and particularly chymical knowledge in the late seventeenth century, norms that were at odds with traditions of secrecy among individual chymists. Between these two standards a tension arose, evidenced by early modern 'vociferous criticisms' of chymical obscurity, with different strategies developed by individual philosophers for negotiating the emergent boundaries between secrecy and openness. Less well studied, however, are the strategies by which not just individuals but also scientific institutions negotiated these boundaries, particularly in the formative years of their public and political reputation in the late seventeenth century. Michael Hunter's recent and welcome study of the 'decline of magic' at the Royal Society has to some extent remedied these omissions. Hunter argues that the Society--as a corporate body--disregarded and avoided studies of magical and alchemical subjects in the late seventeenth century. Our examination problematizes these distinctions and presents a more complex picture.
我们的文章分析了一本鲜为人知的书《法国多个省份矿泉水观察报告》(1675年),该书是对法国矿泉水的一项研究,由法国皇家科学院(成立于1666年)委托并在其内部开展。其作者塞缪尔·科特罗·迪克洛(1598 - 1685)是该科学院的资深创始人物、首席化学家以及最具影响力的成员之一。我们审视《观察报告》,重点关注1666年至1684年期间法国科学院和伦敦皇家学会对化学知识及实践态度的变化。化学是17世纪自然历史学家的基本分析工具,正如劳伦斯·普林西比和威廉·纽曼的研究所示,它对于理解“漫长的”科学革命至关重要。关于17世纪后期科学知识,尤其是化学知识传播与呈现中逐渐形成的开放规范,也有大量研究,这些规范与个别化学家的保密传统相悖。在这两种标准之间产生了一种紧张关系,早期现代对化学晦涩难懂的“激烈批评”就证明了这一点,不同的哲学家为协调保密与开放之间新出现的界限制定了不同策略。然而,较少被研究的是不仅个人而且科学机构协调这些界限的策略,特别是在17世纪后期它们在公众和政治声誉形成阶段的策略。迈克尔·亨特最近对皇家学会“魔法衰落”的可喜研究在一定程度上弥补了这些疏漏。亨特认为,在17世纪后期,作为一个法人团体的皇家学会忽视并回避了对魔法和炼金术主题的研究。我们的审视对这些区分提出了质疑,并呈现出一幅更为复杂的图景。