Friedman Esther M, Park Sung S, Wiemers Emily E
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Department of Sociology, California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles.
Gerontologist. 2017 Apr 1;57(2):191-196. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv080.
We use the Roster and Transfers Module in the 2013 Panel Study of Income Dynamics to obtain the first estimates of the prevalence of transfers to adult children and parents for United States men and women aged 35-75.
This article extends the current understanding of the sandwich generation by comparing recent transfers of time and money to parents and adult children for men and women and across ages between 35 and 75 years of age.
Over 30% of individuals with living parents and adult children provide transfers to two generations. The prevalence of transfers does not differ by age and the differences between men and women are small, though statistically significant. Conditional on providing time transfers, women provide more hours of help than men, particularly to their adult children. The number of hours given to children exceeds the number given to parents.
These findings are the first to show that both men and women are likely to provide transfers to two generations and that transfers to two generations are common across adult ages. Our findings suggest a need to rethink the notion of the sandwich generation, which has focused on women in late middle age, to include men and women across younger and older ages.
我们利用2013年收入动态面板研究中的名册与转移模块,首次估算了美国35至75岁男性和女性向成年子女及父母进行转移支付的比例。
本文通过比较35至75岁男性和女性以及不同年龄段近期向父母和成年子女投入的时间和金钱,拓展了对夹心一代的现有认识。
有在世父母和成年子女的个人中,超过30%的人向两代人进行转移支付。转移支付的比例不因年龄而异,男性和女性之间的差异虽小,但具有统计学意义。在进行时间转移支付的情况下,女性提供的帮助时长多于男性,尤其是对她们的成年子女。给予子女的时长超过给予父母的时长。
这些发现首次表明,男性和女性都有可能向两代人进行转移支付,而且这种向两代人的转移支付在成年人各年龄段都很常见。我们的研究结果表明,有必要重新思考夹心一代的概念,该概念此前主要关注接近中年的女性,现在应涵盖各年龄段的男性和女性。