Hashimoto Tasuku, Sakurai Daiji, Oda Yasunori, Hasegawa Tadashi, Kanahara Nobuhisa, Sasaki Tsuyoshi, Komatsu Hideki, Takahashi Junpei, Oiwa Takahiro, Sekine Yoshimoto, Watanabe Hiroyuki, Iyo Masaomi
Department of Psychiatry, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan ; Sodegaura Satsukidai Hospital, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Psychiatry, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Dec 10;11:3031-40. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S95067. eCollection 2015.
We assessed the effect of switching patients with major depressive disorder to milnacipran following an initial selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment failure, and explored potential biomarkers in their blood.
We conducted a prospective, open-label, 24-week trial. Depression was assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Patients showing a ≥50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores from baseline to final visit were considered responders. Regarding adverse effects (AEs), moderate-to-severe AEs were specifically identified as effects that required any medical treatment or that induced treatment withdrawals. We also measured blood levels of various molecules including inflammatory cytokines.
Of the 30 participants who enrolled, 17 completed this study. The responder rate was 30% (n=10). Baseline serum levels of interleukin-6 (Z=-2.155; P=0.031) and interleukin-8 (Z=-2.616; P=0.009) were significantly higher when moderate-to-severe AEs were present (n=13 patients with moderate-to-severe AEs). Serum levels of macrophage inflammatory protein-1β showed a significant continuous decrease from the baseline level (Friedman's test: χ (2)=23.9, df=4, P<0.001) only in non-responders.
These results demonstrate that serum levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and macrophage inflammatory protein-1β as potential blood biomarkers could be utilized to identify the responsiveness of patients to serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor like milnacipran, or to identify those patients who may experience AEs strong enough to warrant discontinuation of treatment.
我们评估了在最初的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗失败后,将重度抑郁症患者换用米那普明的效果,并探索了他们血液中的潜在生物标志物。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签、为期24周的试验。使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表评估抑郁情况。汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分从基线到最终访视降低≥50%的患者被视为有反应者。关于不良反应(AE),中度至重度不良反应被明确界定为需要任何药物治疗或导致治疗中断的反应。我们还测量了包括炎性细胞因子在内的各种分子的血液水平。
在登记的30名参与者中,17名完成了本研究。有反应者的比例为30%(n = 10)。当出现中度至重度不良反应时(n = 13名有中度至重度不良反应的患者),白细胞介素-6(Z = -2.155;P = 0.031)和白细胞介素-8(Z = -2.616;P = 0.009)的基线血清水平显著更高。仅在无反应者中,巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-1β的血清水平从基线水平开始出现显著持续下降(弗里德曼检验:χ(2)=23.9,自由度=4,P<0.001)。
这些结果表明,白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-8和巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-1β的血清水平作为潜在的血液生物标志物,可用于识别患者对5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(如米那普明)的反应性,或识别那些可能经历足以导致停药的严重不良反应的患者。