Suppr超能文献

谷歌眼镜与传统视频视角用于床边操作技能评估的比较。

A comparison of Google Glass and traditional video vantage points for bedside procedural skill assessment.

作者信息

Evans Heather L, O'Shea Dylan J, Morris Amy E, Keys Kari A, Wright Andrew S, Schaad Douglas C, Ilgen Jonathan S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359796, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.

Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359796, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2016 Feb;211(2):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This pilot study assessed the feasibility of using first person (1P) video recording with Google Glass (GG) to assess procedural skills, as compared with traditional third person (3P) video. We hypothesized that raters reviewing 1P videos would visualize more procedural steps with greater inter-rater reliability than 3P rating vantages.

METHODS

Seven subjects performed simulated internal jugular catheter insertions. Procedures were recorded by both Google Glass and an observer's head-mounted camera. Videos were assessed by 3 expert raters using a task-specific checklist (CL) and both an additive- and summative-global rating scale (GRS). Mean scores were compared by t-tests. Inter-rater reliabilities were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The 1P vantage was associated with a significantly higher mean CL score than the 3P vantage (7.9 vs 6.9, P = .02). Mean GRS scores were not significantly different. Mean inter-rater reliabilities for the CL, additive-GRS, and summative-GRS were similar between vantages.

CONCLUSIONS

1P vantage recordings may improve visualization of tasks for behaviorally anchored instruments (eg, CLs), whereas maintaining similar global ratings and inter-rater reliability when compared with conventional 3P vantage recordings.

摘要

背景

本初步研究评估了使用谷歌眼镜(GG)进行第一人称(1P)视频录制以评估操作技能的可行性,并与传统的第三人称(3P)视频进行比较。我们假设,与3P评级优势相比,查看1P视频的评分者能够看到更多的操作步骤,且评分者间信度更高。

方法

7名受试者进行模拟颈内静脉导管插入操作。操作过程由谷歌眼镜和观察者的头戴式摄像机同时录制。3名专家评分者使用特定任务清单(CL)以及累加式和总结式整体评分量表(GRS)对视频进行评估。通过t检验比较平均分数。使用组内相关系数计算评分者间信度。

结果

1P视角的平均CL评分显著高于3P视角(7.9对6.9,P = 0.02)。平均GRS评分无显著差异。CL、累加式GRS和总结式GRS的平均评分者间信度在不同视角之间相似。

结论

与传统的3P视角录制相比,1P视角录制可能会改善行为锚定工具(如CL)对任务的可视化效果,同时保持相似的整体评分和评分者间信度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验