Clinical Research, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, 6563 N. Charles St., Ste. 400 N, Towson, MD 21204.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1172-81. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1172.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease. Despite starting with single oral antidiabetes drug (OAD) therapy and then adding OAD(s), most patients eventually require insulin therapy to achieve and maintain glycemic control. The timely initiation of insulin therapy could help patients with T2DM whose glycemic control is not adequately maintained using OADs alone.
To describe and compare baseline characteristics and assess real-world health outcomes associated with initiating basal insulin after 1 OAD, 2 OADs, or ≥ 3 OADs among T2DM patients.
Data were analyzed from adult T2DM patients in a U.S. managed care claims database (IMPACT) who initiated a basal insulin (from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2011) with continuous health plan enrollment for 6 months before (baseline) and 12 months after (follow-up) insulin initiation and who had at least 1 OAD prescription. Outcome measures according to the number of OADs used were (a) treatment discontinuation, (b) glycated hemoglobin (A1c) levels, (c) proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycemia, (d) health care resource utilization, and (e) costs.
Data from 71,988 patients were included (1 OAD: 19,168 patients [26.6%]; 2 OADs: 29,112 [40.4%]; and ≥ 3 OADs: 23,708 [32.9%]). All baseline characteristics, except nephropathy, were significantly different across the 3 groups. At baseline, when compared with the 1 OAD or 2 OADs groups, the ≥3 OADs group was less likely to be female or have macrovascular disease and had experienced fewer hypoglycemic events and hospitalization as well as lower costs. At follow-up, treatment discontinuation rates were 36.0%, 27.6%, and 21.4% for the 1 OAD, 2 OADs, and ≥ 3 OADs groups, respectively. A1c reduction was -1.33%, -1.05%, and -0.86%, respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing any hypoglycemia was 4.7%, 3.8%, and 3.3% at baseline; and 3.7%, 3.5%, and 3.1% at follow-up for the 1 OAD, 2 OADs, and ≥3 OADs groups, respectively. In all 3 groups, health care costs decreased compared with baseline, particularly in the 1 OAD and 2 OADs groups, with decreased inpatient costs offsetting increased drug costs.
This real-world analysis shows that there are significant baseline differences in patients with T2DM on 1 OAD, 2 OADs, or ≥3 OADs when adding insulin therapy. All 3 groups had significant improvements in clinical and economic outcomes compared with baseline, yet at different magnitudes. These data contribute to a growing body of evidence supporting the timely initiation of insulin therapy for T2DM patients not maintaining glycemic control with OADs.
2 型糖尿病(T2DM)是一种进展性疾病。尽管起始使用单一口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)治疗,然后添加 OAD,但大多数患者最终仍需要胰岛素治疗以实现和维持血糖控制。及时开始胰岛素治疗可能有助于那些仅使用 OAD 血糖控制不佳的 T2DM 患者。
描述并比较 T2DM 患者起始基础胰岛素治疗时分别使用 1 种、2 种或≥3 种 OAD 的基线特征,并评估与实际相关的健康结局。
本分析的数据来自美国管理式医疗索赔数据库(IMPACT)中接受治疗的成年 T2DM 患者,这些患者在起始基础胰岛素治疗前(基线)的 6 个月内和起始后(随访)的 12 个月内持续参加健康计划,并且至少有 1 次 OAD 处方。根据使用的 OAD 数量,评估治疗中止、糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平、低血糖患者比例、医疗资源利用情况和成本等结局指标。
共纳入 71988 例患者(1 种 OAD:19168 例[26.6%];2 种 OAD:29112 例[40.4%];≥3 种 OAD:23708 例[32.9%])。3 组间所有基线特征(除了肾病)均存在显著差异。在基线时,与 1 种 OAD 或 2 种 OADs 组相比,≥3 种 OAD 组的女性和大血管疾病患者比例较低,低血糖事件和住院治疗发生次数较少,成本较低。在随访时,1 种 OAD、2 种 OADs 和≥3 种 OAD 组的治疗中止率分别为 36.0%、27.6%和 21.4%。A1c 降低值分别为-1.33%、-1.05%和-0.86%。基线时,各组患者的任何低血糖发生率分别为 4.7%、3.8%和 3.3%;随访时分别为 3.7%、3.5%和 3.1%。在所有 3 组中,与基线相比,医疗成本均降低,特别是在 1 种 OAD 和 2 种 OADs 组中,住院费用的降低抵消了药物费用的增加。
本真实世界分析显示,在起始胰岛素治疗时,1 种 OAD、2 种 OADs 或≥3 种 OAD 治疗的 T2DM 患者存在显著的基线差异。与基线相比,所有 3 组患者的临床和经济结局均有显著改善,但改善程度不同。这些数据为及时开始胰岛素治疗 T2DM 患者提供了更多证据,这些患者使用 OAD 治疗血糖控制不佳。