Mangram Alicia J, Oguntodu Olakunle F, Hollingworth Alexandra K, Prokuski Laura, Steinstra Arleen, Collins Mary, Sucher Joseph F, Ali-Osman Francis, Dzandu James K
From the John C. Lincoln North Mountain Hospital (A.J.M., A.K.H., L.P., A.S., M.C., J.F.S., F.A.-O., J.K.D.); and Valley Surgical Clinics, LTD (O.F.O.), Phoenix, Arizona.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Dec;79(6):1067-72; discussion 1072. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000841.
Hip fractures due to falls cause significant morbidity and mortality among geriatric patients. A significant unmet need is an optimal pain management strategy. Consequently, patients are treated with standard analgesic care (SAC) regimens, which deliver high narcotic doses. However, narcotics are associated with delirium as well as gastrointestinal and respiratory failure risks. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided continuous compartmental fascia iliaca block (CFIB) in patients 60 years or older with hip fractures in comparison with SAC alone.
We performed a retrospective study of 108 patients 60 years or older, with acute pain secondary to hip fracture (2012-2013). Patient variables were age, sex, comorbidities, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Primary outcome was pain scores; secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, morbidity, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using (IBM SPSS version 22). For group comparison (SAC vs. SAC + CFIB) median test, repeated-measures analysis and Student's t test of transformed pain scores were used.
Sixty-four patients received SAC only, and 44 patients received SAC + CFIB. Each CFIB placement was successful on first attempt without complications. Median time from emergency department arrival to block placement was 12.5 hours (interquartile range, 4-22 hours). Patients who received SAC + CFIB had significantly lower pain score ratings than patients treated with SAC alone. There were no differences in inpatient morbidity and mortality rates. Patients treated with SAC + CFIB were discharged home more often (p < 0.05).
Ultrasound-guided CFIB is safe, practical, and readily integrated into the G-60 service for improved pain management of hip fractures. We are now conducting a prospective randomized control trial to confirm our observations.
Therapeutic study, level IV.
跌倒导致的髋部骨折在老年患者中会引发严重的发病率和死亡率。一个尚未得到充分满足的重大需求是一种优化的疼痛管理策略。因此,患者接受标准镇痛护理(SAC)方案治疗,该方案会给予高剂量麻醉剂。然而,麻醉剂与谵妄以及胃肠道和呼吸衰竭风险相关。本试点研究的目的是确定超声引导下连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞(CFIB)与单独使用SAC相比,在60岁及以上髋部骨折患者中的安全性和有效性。
我们对108例60岁及以上因髋部骨折导致急性疼痛的患者(2012 - 2013年)进行了回顾性研究。患者变量包括年龄、性别、合并症和损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。主要结局是疼痛评分;次要结局包括住院时间、出院处置、发病率和死亡率。使用(IBM SPSS 22版)进行统计分析。对于组间比较(SAC与SAC + CFIB),使用中位数检验、重复测量分析以及转换后疼痛评分的学生t检验。
64例患者仅接受SAC治疗,44例患者接受SAC + CFIB治疗。每次CFIB置管首次尝试均成功,无并发症。从急诊科到达至置管的中位时间为12.5小时(四分位间距,4 - 22小时)。接受SAC + CFIB治疗的患者疼痛评分显著低于仅接受SAC治疗的患者。住院发病率和死亡率无差异。接受SAC + CFIB治疗的患者更常出院回家(p < 0.05)。
超声引导下CFIB安全、实用,且易于整合到G - 60服务中,以改善髋部骨折的疼痛管理。我们目前正在进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验以证实我们的观察结果。
治疗性研究,IV级。