Song Wei, Gardner Sabrina A, Hovhannisyan Hayk, Natalizio Amanda, Weymouth Katelyn S, Chen Wenjie, Thibodeau Ildiko, Bogdanova Ekaterina, Letovsky Stanley, Willis Alecia, Nagan Narasimhan
Integrated Genetics, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Westborough, Massachusetts, USA.
Integrated Genetics, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Genet Med. 2016 Aug;18(8):850-4. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.180. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
We evaluated the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database as a control cohort to classify variants across a diverse set of genes spanning dominant and recessively inherited disorders.
The frequency of pathogenic variants in ExAC was compared with the estimated maximal pathogenic allele frequency (MPAF), based on the disease prevalence, penetrance, inheritance, allelic and locus heterogeneity of each gene. Additionally, the observed carrier frequency and the ethnicity-specific variant distribution were compared between ExAC and the published literature.
The carrier frequency and ethnic distribution of pathogenic variants in ExAC were concordant with reported estimates. Of 871 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants across 19 genes, only 3 exceeded the estimated MPAF. Eighty-four percent of variants with ExAC frequencies above the estimated MPAF were classified as "benign." Additionally, 20% of the cardiac and 19% of the Lynch syndrome gene variants originally classified as "VUS" occurred with ExAC frequencies above the estimated MPAF, making these suitable for reassessment.
The ExAC database is a useful source for variant classification and is not overrepresented for pathogenic variants in the genes evaluated. However, the mutational spectrum, pseudogenes, genetic heterogeneity, and paucity of literature should be considered in deriving meaningful classifications using ExAC.Genet Med 18 8, 850-854.
我们评估了外显子聚合联盟(ExAC)数据库作为一个对照队列,以对跨越显性和隐性遗传疾病的多种基因中的变异进行分类。
基于每个基因的疾病患病率、外显率、遗传方式、等位基因和位点异质性,将ExAC中致病变异的频率与估计的最大致病变等位基因频率(MPAF)进行比较。此外,还比较了ExAC与已发表文献之间观察到的携带者频率和种族特异性变异分布。
ExAC中致病变异的携带者频率和种族分布与报告的估计值一致。在19个基因中的871个致病/可能致病变异中,只有3个超过了估计的MPAF。ExAC频率高于估计MPAF的变异中有84%被分类为“良性”。此外,最初分类为“意义未明的变异(VUS)”的心脏基因变异中有20%以及林奇综合征基因变异中有19%,其在ExAC中的频率高于估计的MPAF,这使得这些变异适合重新评估。
ExAC数据库是变异分类的有用来源,在所评估的基因中,致病变异并未过度呈现。然而,在使用ExAC进行有意义的分类时,应考虑突变谱、假基因、遗传异质性和文献的匮乏。《遗传医学》18卷8期,850 - 854页