Poletti Venerino, Ravaglia Claudia, Gurioli Carlo, Piciucchi Sara, Dubini Alessandra, Cavazza Alberto, Chilosi Marco, Rossi Andrea, Tomassetti Sara
Pulmonology Unit, Department of Thoracic Diseases, GB Morgagni-L Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Respirology. 2016 Jan;21(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/resp.12694.
Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (f-ILDs) represent a heterogeneous group of disorders in which the aetiology may be identified or, not infrequently, remain unknown. Establishing a correct diagnosis of a distinct f-ILD requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating clinical profile, physiological and laboratory data, radiological appearance and, when appropriate, histological findings. Surgical lung biopsy is still considered the most important diagnostic tool as it is able to provide lung samples large enough for identification of complex patterns such as usual interstitial pneumonitis (UIP) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis. However, this procedure is accompanied by significant morbidity and mortality. Bronchoalveolar lavage is still a popular diagnostic tool allowing identification of alternative diagnoses in patients with suspected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) when an increase in lymphocytes is detected. Conventional transbronchial lung biopsy has a very low sensitivity in detecting the UIP pattern and its role in this clinical-radiological context is marginal. The introduction of less invasive methods such as transbronchial cryobiopsy show great promise to clinical practice as they can be used to obtain samples large enough to morphologically support a diagnosis of IPF or other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, along with fewer complications. Recent advances in the field suggest that less invasive methods of lung sampling, without significant side effects, in combination with other diagnostic methods could replace the need for surgical lung biopsy in the future. Indeed, these new multidisciplinary procedures may become the main diagnostic work-up method for patients with suspected idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.
纤维化间质性肺疾病(f-ILDs)是一组异质性疾病,其病因可能明确,也不乏病因不明的情况。要正确诊断一种特定的f-ILD,需要采用多学科方法,综合临床特征、生理和实验室数据、影像学表现,并在适当情况下结合组织学检查结果。外科肺活检仍然被认为是最重要的诊断工具,因为它能够提供足够大的肺组织样本,以识别复杂的病理模式,如寻常型间质性肺炎(UIP)和非特异性间质性肺炎。然而,该操作伴随着较高的发病率和死亡率。支气管肺泡灌洗仍然是一种常用的诊断工具,当检测到淋巴细胞增多时,可用于识别疑似特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者的其他诊断。传统的经支气管肺活检在检测UIP模式方面灵敏度非常低,在这种临床-影像学背景下其作用微乎其微。经支气管冷冻活检等侵入性较小的方法的引入,对临床实践具有很大的前景,因为它们可用于获取足够大的样本,从形态学上支持IPF或其他特发性间质性肺炎的诊断,且并发症较少。该领域的最新进展表明,侵入性较小且无明显副作用的肺采样方法,与其他诊断方法相结合,未来可能会取代外科肺活检的需求。事实上,这些新的多学科程序可能会成为疑似特发性间质性肺炎患者的主要诊断检查方法。