Ruaro Renata, Gubiani Éder André, Cunico Almir Manoel, Moretto Yara, Piana Pitágoras Augusto
Graduate Program in Conservation and Management of Natural Resources, Western Paraná State University, Rua Universitária, Bairro Universitário, 2069, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.
Research Group in Fisheries and Limnology (Gerpel), Western Paraná State University, Rua da Faculdade 645, Toledo, Paraná, 85903-000, Brazil.
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Jan;188(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-5046-9. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
The biomonitoring of aquatic ecosystems in developing countries faces several limitations, especially related to gathering resources. The present study aimed at comparing the responses of fish and benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental change, to identify which group best indicates the differences between reference and impacted streams in southern Brazil. We determined reference and impacted sites based on physical and chemical variables of the water. For the analysis and comparison of biological responses, we calculated 22 metrics and submitted them to a discriminant analysis. We selected from this analysis only six metrics, which showed that the two studied assemblages respond differently to environmental change. A larger number of metrics were selected for macroinvertebrates than for fish in the separate analysis. The metrics selected for macroinvertebrates in the pooled analysis (i.e., fish and macroinvertebrates together) were different from those selected in the separate analysis for macroinvertebrates alone. However, the metrics selected for fish in the pooled analysis were the same selected in the separate analysis for fish alone. The macroinvertebrate assemblage was more effective for distinguishing reference from impacted sites. We suggest the use of macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of Neotropical streams, especially in situations in which time and money are short.
发展中国家水生生态系统的生物监测面临若干限制,尤其是在资源收集方面。本研究旨在比较鱼类和底栖大型无脊椎动物对环境变化的反应,以确定哪一组能最好地表明巴西南部参考溪流和受影响溪流之间的差异。我们根据水体的物理和化学变量确定了参考站点和受影响站点。为了分析和比较生物反应,我们计算了22个指标,并将其提交给判别分析。我们从该分析中仅选择了六个指标,结果表明所研究的两个生物群落对环境变化的反应不同。在单独分析中,为大型无脊椎动物选择的指标数量多于鱼类。在合并分析(即鱼类和大型无脊椎动物一起)中为大型无脊椎动物选择的指标与单独对大型无脊椎动物进行分析时选择的指标不同。然而,在合并分析中为鱼类选择的指标与单独对鱼类进行分析时选择的指标相同。大型无脊椎动物群落对于区分参考站点和受影响站点更为有效。我们建议将大型无脊椎动物用作新热带溪流的生物指示物,尤其是在时间和资金短缺的情况下。