Bouillon Kim, Bertrand Marion, Maura Géric, Blotière Pierre-Olivier, Ricordeau Philippe, Zureik Mahmoud
Department of Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France.
Strategy and Research Department, National Health Insurance, Paris, France.
Lancet Haematol. 2015 Apr;2(4):e150-9. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00027-7. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are receiving or have been previously exposed to a vitamin K antagonist could be switched to a non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) but little information is available about the risk of bleeding and arterial thromboembolism after such a switch. We aimed to compare the risk of bleeding between individuals who switched and those who remained on a vitamin K antagonist (non-switchers) in real-world conditions.
We did a matched-cohort study with information from French health-care databases. We extracted data for adults (aged ≥18 years) with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who received their first prescription for a vitamin K antagonist (fluindione, warfarin, or acenocoumarol) between Jan 1, 2011, and Nov 30, 2012, and who were either switched to a NOAC (dabigatran or rivaroxaban) or maintained on the vitamin K antagonist. Each switcher was matched with up to two non-switchers on the basis of eight variables, including sex, age, and international normalised ratio number. The primary endpoint was incidence of bleeding (intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, or other) in switchers versus non-switchers, and switchers stratified by type of NOAC versus non-switchers, noted from databases of hospital admissions. Each patient was followed up to 1 year; the study closed on Oct 1, 2013.
Of 17,410 participants, 6705 switched to a NOAC (switchers) and 10,705 remained on vitamin K-antagonist therapy (non-switchers). Median age of participants was 75 years (IQR 67-82), 8339 (48%) were women, and the median duration of vitamin K-antagonist exposure before a switch was 8.1 months (IQR 3.9-14.0). After a median follow-up of 10.0 months (IQR 9.8-10.0), we noted no difference between groups for bleeding events (99 [1%] in switchers vs 193 [2%] in non-switchers, p=0.54). In adjusted multivariate analyses, the risk of bleeding in switchers was not different from that in non-switchers (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% CI 0.67-1.13, p=0.30). Additionally, no differences were noted when the risk of bleeding was compared between switchers from a vitamin K antagonist to dabigatran (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-1.09, p=0.15), switchers from a vitamin K antagonist to rivaroxaban (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.68-1.58, p=0.86), and non-switchers.
In this matched-cohort study, our findings suggest that patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who switch their oral anticoagulant treatment from a vitamin K antagonist to a non-vitamin K antagonist are not at increased risk of bleeding. Future studies with longer follow-up might be needed.
None.
正在接受或既往曾暴露于维生素K拮抗剂的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者可换用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOAC),但关于换药后出血和动脉血栓栓塞风险的信息较少。我们旨在比较现实环境中换药者与继续使用维生素K拮抗剂者(未换药者)之间的出血风险。
我们利用法国医疗保健数据库中的信息进行了一项匹配队列研究。我们提取了2011年1月1日至2012年11月30日期间首次接受维生素K拮抗剂(氟茚二酮、华法林或醋硝香豆素)处方的非瓣膜性心房颤动成年患者(年龄≥18岁)的数据,这些患者随后换用了NOAC(达比加群或利伐沙班)或继续接受维生素K拮抗剂治疗。根据包括性别、年龄和国际标准化比值数在内的8个变量,为每名换药者匹配最多2名未换药者。主要终点是根据医院入院数据库记录的换药者与未换药者之间以及按NOAC类型分层的换药者与未换药者之间的出血(颅内出血、胃肠道出血或其他出血)发生率。对每名患者随访1年;研究于2013年10月1日结束。
17410名参与者中,6705名换用了NOAC(换药者),10705名继续接受维生素K拮抗剂治疗(未换药者)。参与者的中位年龄为75岁(四分位间距67 - 82岁),8339名(48%)为女性,换药前维生素K拮抗剂暴露的中位持续时间为8.1个月(四分位间距3.9 - 14.0个月)。中位随访10.0个月(四分位间距9.8 - 10.0个月)后,我们发现两组出血事件无差异(换药者99例[1%],未换药者193例[2%],p = 0.54)。在调整后的多变量分析中,换药者的出血风险与未换药者无差异(风险比[HR]0.87;95%置信区间0.67 - 1.13,p = 0.30)。此外,比较从维生素K拮抗剂换用达比加群的换药者(HR 0.78,95%置信区间0.54 - 1.09,p = 0.15)、从维生素K拮抗剂换用利伐沙班的换药者(HR 1.04,95%置信区间0.68 - 1.58,p = 0.86)与未换药者之间的出血风险时,未发现差异。
在这项匹配队列研究中,我们的研究结果表明,非瓣膜性心房颤动患者将口服抗凝治疗从维生素K拮抗剂换用非维生素K拮抗剂时,出血风险并未增加。可能需要进行随访时间更长的未来研究。
无。