Gantner Pierre, Treger Michele, De Miscault Constance, Batard Marie-Laure, Bernard-Henry Claudine, Cheneau Christine, De Mautort Erik, Partisani Marialuisa, Priester Michele, Rey David
Le Trait d'Union, HIV-infection care center, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Biostatistics Laboratory, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 22;10(12):e0145440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145440. eCollection 2015.
The care of exposed individuals to HIV remains a challenge regarding follow-up completion and HIV-testing of the partner. Identifying patients with risk of not fulfilling HIV-testing follow-up completion (FC), among patients demanding non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP), may improve clinical practice.
A retrospective chart review was conducted in a single French HIV-infection care center. FC predictors were assessed in a multivariate logistic regression model (Likelihood ratios test).
Between 2009 and 2013, 646 sexual exposures to HIV were evaluated for nPEP, of which 507 effectively received nPEP (78%). FC rate was 30% (194/646). In the multivariate analysis, FC rates rose with age of exposed individuals (OR, 1.04 [0.25-4.28]; p<0.001) and decreased with the year of sexual exposure (OR, 0.74 [0.65-0.85]; p<0.001). FC was associated with sexual encounter with a sex worker (OR, 4.07 [0.98-16.82]; p<0.001) and nPEP use (OR, 2.69 [2.37-3.06]; p<0.001). nPEP early discontinuation was associated with decreased FC rates (OR, 0.18 [0.08-0.39]; p<0.001). No documented nPEP failure was identified. However, five Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) nPEP recipients for unprotected anal receptive intercourse subsequently seroconverted to HIV more than 6 months after nPEP. Seroconversion to HIV was associated with the lack of FC (p = 0.04) and multiple presentations for nPEP over the study period (p = 0.002).
We identified significant predictors of not fulfilling sequential HIV-testing. They appear to be linked with a self-perceived HIV risk, especially in young adults recently exposed. Enhanced counseling in targeted individuals with high risk behaviors and using smartphone and internet-based strategies may be interesting retention in care options.
在对暴露于艾滋病毒的个体进行护理时,后续随访的完成以及其性伴侣的艾滋病毒检测仍是一项挑战。在要求进行非职业性暴露后预防(nPEP)的患者中,识别有未完成艾滋病毒检测随访风险的患者,可能会改善临床实践。
在法国一家单一的艾滋病毒感染护理中心进行了一项回顾性病历审查。在多变量逻辑回归模型(似然比检验)中评估随访完成情况的预测因素。
2009年至2013年期间,对646例因性接触暴露于艾滋病毒的情况进行了nPEP评估,其中507例实际接受了nPEP(78%)。随访完成率为30%(194/646)。在多变量分析中,随访完成率随暴露个体年龄的增加而上升(比值比,1.04[0.25 - 4.28];p<0.001),并随性接触年份的增加而下降(比值比,0.74[0.65 - 0.85];p<0.001)。随访完成情况与与性工作者发生性接触(比值比,4.07[0.98 - 16.82];p<0.001)和使用nPEP(比值比,2.69[2.37 - 3.06];p<0.001)相关。提前停止使用nPEP与随访完成率降低相关(比值比,0.18[0.08 - 0.39];p<0.001)。未发现有记录的nPEP失败情况。然而,5名接受nPEP用于无保护肛交的男男性行为者(MSM)在接受nPEP后6个月以上随后血清转化为艾滋病毒。血清转化为艾滋病毒与未完成随访(p = 0.04)以及在研究期间多次接受nPEP(p = 0.002)相关。
我们确定了未完成后续艾滋病毒检测的重要预测因素。它们似乎与自我感知的艾滋病毒风险有关,尤其是在近期暴露的年轻人中。针对有高风险行为的个体加强咨询,并采用基于智能手机和互联网的策略,可能是有趣的护理保留选项。