Viano David C, Parenteau Chantal S
a ProBiomechanics LLC , Bloomfield Hills , Michigan.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Jul 3;17(5):524-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1120295. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) high-hooded side impacts were analyzed for matched vehicle tests with and without side airbags. The comparison provides a measure of the effectiveness of side airbags in reducing biomechanical responses for near-side occupants struck by trucks, SUVs, and vans at 50 km/h.
The IIHS moving deformable barrier (MDB) uses a high-hooded barrier face. It weighs 1,500 kg and impacts the driver side perpendicular to the vehicle at 50 km/h. SID IIs dummies are placed in the driver and left second-row seats. They represent fifth percentile female occupants. IIHS tests were reviewed for matches with one test with a side airbag and another without it in 2003-2007 model year (MY) vehicles. Four side airbag systems were evaluated: (1) curtain and torso side airbags, (2) head and torso side airbag, (3) curtain side airbag, and (4) torso side airbag. There were 24 matched IIHS vehicle tests: 13 with and without a curtain and torso side airbags, 4 with and without a head and torso side airbag, 5 with and without a side curtain airbag, and 2 with and without a torso airbag. The head, chest, and pelvis responses were compared for each match and the average difference was determined across all matches for a type of side airbag.
The average reduction in head injury criterion (HIC) was 68 ± 16% (P < .001) with curtain and torso side airbags compared to the HIC without side airbags. The average HIC was 296 with curtain and torso side airbags and 1,199 without them. The viscous response (VC) was reduced 54 ± 19% (P < .005) with curtain and torso side airbags. The combined acetabulum and ilium force (7 ± 15%) and pelvic acceleration (-2 ± 17%) were essentially similar in the matched tests. The head and torso side airbag reduced HIC by 42 ± 30% (P < .1) and VC by 32 ± 26% compared to vehicles without a side airbag. The average HIC was 397 with the side head and torso airbag compared to 729 without it. The curtain airbag and torso airbag only showed lower head responses but essentially no difference in the chest and pelvis responses.
The curtain and torso side airbags effectively reduced biomechanical responses for the head and chest in 50 km/h side impacts with a high-hooded deformable barrier. The reductions in the IIHS tests are directionally the same as estimated fatality reductions in field crashes reported by NHTSA for side airbags.
对美国公路安全保险协会(IIHS)的高顶侧撞试验进行分析,比较配备和未配备侧面安全气囊的车辆测试情况。该比较提供了一种衡量侧面安全气囊在减少卡车、运动型多用途汽车(SUV)和厢式货车以50公里/小时速度撞击时,近侧乘客生物力学响应有效性的方法。
IIHS的移动变形壁障(MDB)采用高顶壁障面。其重量为1500千克,以50公里/小时的速度垂直撞击车辆驾驶员侧。SID II d假人放置在驾驶员和左后排座椅上。它们代表第5百分位的女性乘客。对2003 - 2007车型年(MY)车辆中一项有侧面安全气囊和另一项没有侧面安全气囊的匹配测试的IIHS测试进行了审查。评估了四种侧面安全气囊系统:(1)帘式和躯干侧面安全气囊,(2)头部和躯干侧面安全气囊,(3)帘式侧面安全气囊,(4)躯干侧面安全气囊。共有24项匹配的IIHS车辆测试:13项有和没有帘式和躯干侧面安全气囊,4项有和没有头部和躯干侧面安全气囊,5项有和没有侧面帘式安全气囊,2项有和没有躯干安全气囊。对每次匹配的头部、胸部和骨盆响应进行比较,并确定一种侧面安全气囊所有匹配测试的平均差异。
与没有侧面安全气囊相比,配备帘式和躯干侧面安全气囊时,头部损伤标准(HIC)平均降低68±16%(P <.001)。配备帘式和躯干侧面安全气囊时平均HIC为296,没有时为1199。配备帘式和躯干侧面安全气囊时,粘性响应(VC)降低54±19%(P <.005)。在匹配测试中,髋臼和髂骨合力(7±15%)和骨盆加速度(-2±17%)基本相似。与没有侧面安全气囊的车辆相比,头部和躯干侧面安全气囊使HIC降低42±30%(P <.1),VC降低32±26%。配备侧面头部和躯干安全气囊时平均HIC为397,没有时为729。帘式安全气囊和躯干安全气囊仅显示头部响应较低,但胸部和骨盆响应基本无差异。
在以50公里/小时速度与高顶变形壁障进行侧面撞击时,帘式和躯干侧面安全气囊有效降低了头部和胸部的生物力学响应。IIHS测试中的降低情况与美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)报告的侧面安全气囊在实际碰撞中估计的死亡人数减少情况方向相同。