Weinberg Laurence, Miles Lachlan F, Allaf Maysana, Pillai Param, Peyton Philip, Doolan Laurie
Department of Anesthesia, Department of Surgery and Centre for Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):1511-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.033. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
To determine whether video fluoroscopy combined with traditional pressure waveform analyses facilitates optimal pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) flotation and final positioning compared with the traditional pressure waveform flotation technique alone.
Prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial.
Single-center university teaching hospital.
The study included 50 cardiac surgery patients at higher risk for PAC complications.
Use of video fluoroscopy to facilitate optimal PAC flotation and positioning.
The primary outcome was the time taken to float and position the PAC balloon in the pulmonary artery as confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography. Secondary outcomes included number of attempts at flotation, ventricular rhythm disturbances, and catheter malposition. Patients were evenly matched in baseline demographics, New York Heart Association symptoms of heart failure, severity of left and right ventricular dysfunction, end-diastolic pressures and dimensions, severity of tricuspid valvular disease, and atrial and pulmonary artery pressures. Mean (SD) time to float the PAC was significantly shorter in the video fluoroscopy group than in the usual care group: 73 seconds (SD, 65.1) versus 176 seconds (SD, 180.6), respectively; p = 0.014. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) number of attempts to successful flotation was fewer in the video fluoroscopy group than in the usual care group: 1 (IQR 1:2) attempt versus 2 (IQR 1:4) attempts, respectively; p = 0.007. The composite complication rate (malposition and arrhythmias) was lower in the video fluoroscopy group than in the usual care group (16% v 52%, respectively; p = 0.01).
In cardiac surgery patients at higher risk for PAC complications, video fluoroscopy facilitated faster and safer catheter flotation and positioning compared with the traditional pressure waveform flotation technique.
确定与单独使用传统压力波形漂浮技术相比,视频透视检查联合传统压力波形分析是否有助于肺动脉导管(PAC)的最佳漂浮和最终定位。
前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验。
单中心大学教学医院。
该研究纳入了50例发生PAC并发症风险较高的心脏手术患者。
使用视频透视检查以促进PAC的最佳漂浮和定位。
主要结局指标为经食管超声心动图确认PAC球囊漂浮并定位在肺动脉内所需的时间。次要结局指标包括漂浮尝试次数、室性心律失常以及导管位置异常。患者在基线人口统计学特征、纽约心脏协会心力衰竭症状、左心室和右心室功能障碍严重程度、舒张末期压力和内径、三尖瓣疾病严重程度以及心房和肺动脉压力方面匹配良好。视频透视检查组PAC漂浮的平均(标准差)时间显著短于常规治疗组:分别为73秒(标准差,65.1)和176秒(标准差,180.6);p = 0.014。视频透视检查组成功漂浮的尝试次数中位数(四分位间距[IQR])少于常规治疗组:分别为1次(IQR 1:2)尝试和2次(IQR 1:4)尝试;p = 0.007。视频透视检查组的综合并发症发生率(位置异常和心律失常)低于常规治疗组(分别为16%和52%;p = 0.01)。
在发生PAC并发症风险较高的心脏手术患者中,与传统压力波形漂浮技术相比,视频透视检查有助于更快、更安全地进行导管漂浮和定位。