Suppr超能文献

如何为老年人提供有尊严的护理?一项针对医疗保健专业人员的调查。

What facilitates the delivery of dignified care to older people? A survey of health care professionals.

作者信息

Kinnear Deborah, Victor Christina, Williams Veronika

机构信息

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2015 Dec 28;8:826. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1801-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whilst the past decade has seen a growing emphasis placed upon ensuring dignity in the care of older people this policy objective is not being consistently achieved and there appears a gap between policy and practice. We need to understand how dignified care for older people is understood and delivered by the health and social care workforce and how organisational structures and policies can promote and facilitate, or hinder, the delivery of such care.

METHODS

To achieve our objective of understanding the facilitators and to the delivery of dignified care we undertook a survey with health and social care professionals across four NHS Trusts in England. Participants were asked provide free text answers identifying any facilitators/barriers to the provision of dignified care. Survey data was entered into SPSSv15 and analysed using descriptive statistics. These data provided the overall context describing staff attitudes and beliefs about dignity and the provision of dignified care. Qualitative data from the survey were transcribed verbatim and categorised into themes using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

192 respondents were included in the analysis. 79% of respondents identified factors within their working environment that helped them provide dignified care and 68% identified barriers to achieving this policy objective. Facilitators and barriers to delivering dignified care were categorised into three domains: 'organisational level'; 'ward level' and 'individual level'. Within the these levels, respondents reported factors that both supported and hindered dignity in care including 'time', 'staffing levels', training',' 'ward environment', 'staff attitudes', 'support', 'involving family/carers', and 'reflection'.

CONCLUSION

Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of dignity as perceived by health and social care professionals are multi-faceted and range from practical issues to interpersonal and training needs. Thus interventions to support health and social care professionals in delivering dignified care, need to take a range of issues into account to ensure that older people receive a high standard of care in NHS Trusts.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,人们越来越重视确保老年人护理中的尊严,但这一政策目标并未始终得到实现,政策与实践之间似乎存在差距。我们需要了解卫生和社会护理人员如何理解和提供有尊严的老年人护理,以及组织结构和政策如何促进或阻碍这种护理的提供。

方法

为了实现我们了解促进因素和有尊严护理提供情况的目标,我们对英格兰四个国民保健服务信托基金的卫生和社会护理专业人员进行了一项调查。参与者被要求提供自由文本答案,指出提供有尊严护理的任何促进因素/障碍。调查数据输入SPSSv15并使用描述性统计进行分析。这些数据提供了描述工作人员对尊严和有尊严护理的态度和信念的总体背景。调查的定性数据逐字转录,并使用主题分析归类为主题。

结果

192名受访者纳入分析。79%的受访者指出其工作环境中的因素有助于他们提供有尊严的护理,68%的受访者指出实现这一政策目标的障碍。提供有尊严护理的促进因素和障碍分为三个领域:“组织层面”;“病房层面”和“个人层面”。在这些层面中,受访者报告了支持和阻碍护理尊严的因素,包括“时间”、“人员配备水平”、“培训”、“病房环境”、“工作人员态度”、“支持”、“让家人/照顾者参与”和“反思”。

结论

卫生和社会护理专业人员所认为的尊严提供的促进因素和障碍是多方面的,从实际问题到人际和培训需求。因此,支持卫生和社会护理专业人员提供有尊严护理的干预措施需要考虑一系列问题,以确保老年人在国民保健服务信托基金中获得高标准的护理。

相似文献

2
The views of older people and health professionals about dignity in acute hospital care.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):223-234. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13877. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
8
Rapid evaluation of the Special Measures for Quality and challenged provider regimes: a mixed-methods study.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(19):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GQQV3512.
9
10
From Right place--Wrong person, to Right place--Right person: dignified care for older people.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Apr;17 Suppl 2:30-6. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011118.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Conceptual Framework for an Age-Friendly Health System: A Scoping Review.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7342. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7342. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
Social Innovation Toward a Meaningful Everyday Life for Nursing Home Residents: An Ethnographic Study.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 25;12:666079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666079. eCollection 2021.
3
Social dignity for marginalized people in public healthcare: an interpretive review and building blocks for a non-ideal theory.
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09987-8. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

2
The significance of small things for dignity in psychiatric care.
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Nov;22(7):754-64. doi: 10.1177/0969733014551376. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
3
Dignity as honour-wound: an experiential and relational view.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):410-8. doi: 10.1111/jep.12278. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
4
Student nurses' experiences of preserved dignity in perioperative practice - Part I.
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Sep;22(6):676-87. doi: 10.1177/0969733014542675. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
5
The meaning of dignity in nursing home care as seen by relatives.
Nurs Ethics. 2014 Aug;21(5):507-17. doi: 10.1177/0969733013511358. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
Dignity in care: time to take action.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Nov;46(5):756-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
9
Living and dying with dignity in Chinese society: perspectives of older palliative care patients in Hong Kong.
Age Ageing. 2013 Jul;42(4):455-61. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft003. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
10
Respect, compassion and dignity: the foundations of ethical and professional caring.
J Perioper Pract. 2012 Jul;22(7):216-9. doi: 10.1177/175045891202200701.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验