Simone Ashley N, Bédard Anne-Claude V, Marks David J, Halperin Jeffrey M
1The Graduate Center,City University of New York,New York.
2Ontario Institute for Studies in Education,the University of Toronto,Canada.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Jan;22(1):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715001010.
The aim of this study was to examine working memory (WM) modalities (visual-spatial and auditory-verbal) and processes (maintenance and manipulation) in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The sample consisted of 63 8-year-old children with ADHD and an age- and sex-matched non-ADHD comparison group (N=51). Auditory-verbal and visual-spatial WM were assessed using the Digit Span and Spatial Span subtests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Integrated - Fourth Edition. WM maintenance and manipulation were assessed via forward and backward span indices, respectively. Data were analyzed using a 3-way Group (ADHD vs. non-ADHD)×Modality (Auditory-Verbal vs. Visual-Spatial)×Condition (Forward vs. Backward) Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Secondary analyses examined differences between Combined and Predominantly Inattentive ADHD presentations. Significant Group×Condition (p=.02) and Group×Modality (p=.03) interactions indicated differentially poorer performance by those with ADHD on backward relative to forward and visual-spatial relative to auditory-verbal tasks, respectively. The 3-way interaction was not significant. Analyses targeting ADHD presentations yielded a significant Group×Condition interaction (p=.009) such that children with ADHD-Predominantly Inattentive Presentation performed differentially poorer on backward relative to forward tasks compared to the children with ADHD-Combined Presentation. Findings indicate a specific pattern of WM weaknesses (i.e., WM manipulation and visual-spatial tasks) for children with ADHD. Furthermore, differential patterns of WM performance were found for children with ADHD-Predominantly Inattentive versus Combined Presentations. (JINS, 2016, 22, 1-11).
本研究旨在考察患有和未患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童的工作记忆(WM)模式(视觉空间和听觉言语)及过程(维持和操作)。样本包括63名8岁的ADHD儿童以及一个年龄和性别匹配的非ADHD对照组(N = 51)。使用韦氏儿童智力量表整合版第四版中的数字广度和空间广度分测验来评估听觉言语和视觉空间工作记忆。分别通过顺背和倒背广度指标来评估工作记忆的维持和操作。使用三因素组间方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行分析,因素分别为组(ADHD组与非ADHD组)×模式(听觉言语与视觉空间)×条件(顺背与倒背)。二级分析考察了混合型与主要为注意力不集中型ADHD表现之间的差异。显著的组×条件交互作用(p = 0.02)和组×模式交互作用(p = 0.03)表明,ADHD儿童在倒背任务上相对于顺背任务表现较差,在视觉空间任务上相对于听觉言语任务表现较差。三因素交互作用不显著。针对ADHD表现类型的分析产生了显著的组×条件交互作用(p = 0.009),即主要为注意力不集中型ADHD表现的儿童在倒背任务上相对于顺背任务的表现比混合型ADHD表现的儿童更差。研究结果表明,ADHD儿童存在特定的工作记忆弱点模式(即工作记忆操作和视觉空间任务)。此外,还发现主要为注意力不集中型与混合型ADHD表现的儿童在工作记忆表现上存在差异模式。(《日本神经心理学杂志》,2016年,第22卷,第1 - 11页)