Santiago-Torres Margarita, Kratz Mario, Lampe Johanna W, Tapsoba Jean De Dieu, Breymeyer Kara L, Levy Lisa, Villaseñor Adriana, Wang Ching-Yun, Song Xiaoling, Neuhouser Marian L
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;103(2):366-74. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.119016. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Mexican immigrants are disproportionally affected by diet-related risk of metabolic dysfunction. Whether adhering to a traditional Mexican diet or adopting a US diet contributes to metabolic changes associated with future risk of type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases has not been investigated.
The purpose of this study was to test in a randomized crossover feeding trial the metabolic responses to a Mexican diet compared with a commonly consumed US diet.
First- and second-generation healthy women of Mexican descent (n = 53) were randomly assigned in a crossover design to consume a Mexican or US diet for 24 d each, separated by a 28-d washout period. Diets were eucaloric and similar in macronutrient composition. The metabolic responses to diets were assessed by measuring fasting serum concentrations of glucose, insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), adiponectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6), as well as the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at the beginning and end of each period. Linear mixed models tested the intervention effect on the biomarkers, while adjusting for diet sequence, feeding period, baseline and washout biomarker concentrations, age, acculturation, and BMI.
Compared with the US diet, the Mexican diet reduced insulin by 14% [geometric means (95% CIs): 9.3 (8.3, 10.3) compared with 8.0 (7.2, 8.9) μU/mL; P = 0.02], HOMA-IR by 15% [2.0 (1.8, 2.3) compared with 1.7 (1.6, 2.0); P = 0.02], and IGFBP-3 by 6% (mean ± SEM: 2420 ± 29 compared with 2299 ± 29 ng/mL; P < 0.01) and tended to reduce circulating concentrations of IGF-1 by 4% (149 ± 2.6 compared with 144 ± 2.5 ng/mL; P = 0.06). There was no significant intervention effect on serum concentrations of glucose, adiponectin, CRP, or IL-6 in the US compared with the Mexican diet.
Compared with the commonly consumed US diet, the traditional Mexican diet modestly improved insulin sensitivity under conditions of weight stability in healthy women of Mexican descent, while having no impact on biomarkers of inflammation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01369173.
墨西哥移民受与饮食相关的代谢功能障碍风险影响的比例过高。坚持传统墨西哥饮食或采用美国饮食是否会导致与2型糖尿病及其他慢性病未来风险相关的代谢变化,尚未得到研究。
本研究的目的是在一项随机交叉喂养试验中,测试与常见的美国饮食相比,墨西哥饮食的代谢反应。
第一代和第二代健康的墨西哥裔女性(n = 53)采用交叉设计随机分组,每组分别食用墨西哥饮食或美国饮食24天,中间间隔28天的洗脱期。饮食热量相同,宏量营养素组成相似。通过测量每个阶段开始和结束时空腹血清中的葡萄糖、胰岛素、胰岛素样生长因子1(IGF-1)、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白3(IGFBP-3)、脂联素、C反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞介素6(IL-6)浓度,以及胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR),来评估对饮食的代谢反应。线性混合模型在调整饮食顺序、喂养期、基线和洗脱期生物标志物浓度、年龄、文化适应程度和BMI后,测试干预对生物标志物的影响。
与美国饮食相比,墨西哥饮食使胰岛素降低了14%[几何均值(95%置信区间):9.3(8.3,10.3)与8.0(7.2,8.9)μU/mL;P = 0.02],HOMA-IR降低了15%[2.0(1.8,2.3)与1.7(1.6,2.0);P = 0.02],IGFBP-3降低了6%(均值±标准误:2420±29与2299±29 ng/mL;P < 0.01),并且倾向于使循环中的IGF-1浓度降低4%(149±2.6与144±2.5 ng/mL;P = 0.06)。与墨西哥饮食相比,美国饮食对血清葡萄糖、脂联素、CRP或IL-6浓度没有显著的干预效果。
与常见的美国饮食相比,传统墨西哥饮食在体重稳定的情况下适度改善了墨西哥裔健康女性的胰岛素敏感性,同时对炎症生物标志物没有影响。该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT01369173。