Jung Jeah Kyoungrae, Wu Bingxiao, Kim Hyunjee, Polsky Daniel
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Dec;73(6):703-723. doi: 10.1177/1077558715623718. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
We examine consumers' use of publicized quality information in Medicare home health care markets, where consumer cost sharing and travel costs are absent. We report two findings. First, agencies with high quality scores are more likely to be preferred by consumers after the introduction of a public reporting program than before. Second, consumers' use of publicized quality information differs by patient group. Community-based patients have slightly larger responses to public reporting than hospital-discharged patients. Patients with functional limitations at the start of their care, at least among hospital-discharged patients, have a larger response to the reported functional outcome measure than those without functional limitations. In all cases of significant marginal effects, magnitudes are small. We conclude that the current public reporting approach is unlikely to have critical impacts on home health agency choice. Identifying and releasing quality information that is meaningful to consumers may help increase consumers' use of public reports.
我们研究了消费者在医疗保险家庭医疗市场中对公开质量信息的使用情况,在该市场中消费者无需分担成本和承担交通费用。我们报告了两项发现。第一,在引入公开报告计划后,质量得分高的机构比之前更有可能受到消费者青睐。第二,消费者对公开质量信息的使用因患者群体而异。与医院出院患者相比,社区患者对公开报告的反应略大。在护理开始时存在功能限制的患者,至少在医院出院患者中,对报告的功能结局指标的反应比没有功能限制的患者更大。在所有显著边际效应的情况下,效应量都很小。我们得出结论,当前的公开报告方法不太可能对家庭健康机构的选择产生关键影响。识别并发布对消费者有意义的质量信息可能有助于增加消费者对公开报告的使用。