Briley Paul M, Goman Adele M, Summerfield A Quentin
aDepartment of Psychology bHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
Neuroreport. 2016 Mar 2;27(4):242-6. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000527.
Studies on humans and other mammals have provided evidence for a two-channel or three-channel representation of horizontal space in the auditory system, with one channel maximally responsive to each of the left hemispace, the right hemispace and, possibly, the midline. Mammalian studies have suggested that the contralateral channel is larger in both cortices, but human studies have found this contralateral preference in only one of the cortices. However, human studies are in conflict as to whether the contralateral preference is in the left or the right auditory cortex, and there are a number of methodological differences that this conflict could be attributed to. A key difference between studies is the duration of the silent interval preceding each stimulus and any perception of sound-source movement that the absence of a silent interval creates. We presented auditory noises that alternated between -90° (left) and +90° (right) and recorded neural responses (event-related potentials) using electroencephalography. We randomly varied the duration of the silent interval preceding each stimulus to create a condition with an immediate (local) stimulus context similar to that used in a study reporting contralateral preference in the left auditory cortex, a condition with a local context similar to that in a study reporting contralateral preference in the right auditory cortex, and an intermediate condition. Surprisingly, we found that both auditory cortices exhibited a similarly strong contralateral preference under all conditions, with responses 27% greater, on average, to the contralateral than the ipsilateral space. This suggests that both the cortices can exhibit a contralateral preference, but whether these preferences manifest depends on the global, rather than the local, stimulus context.
对人类和其他哺乳动物的研究为听觉系统中水平空间的双通道或三通道表征提供了证据,其中一个通道对左半空间、右半空间以及可能的中线中的每一个都具有最大反应。哺乳动物研究表明,双侧皮质中的对侧通道更大,但人类研究仅在其中一个皮质中发现了这种对侧偏好。然而,关于对侧偏好是在左听觉皮质还是右听觉皮质,人类研究存在冲突,并且这种冲突可能归因于一些方法学上的差异。研究之间的一个关键差异是每个刺激之前的静音间隔持续时间以及没有静音间隔所产生的任何声源运动感知。我们呈现了在 -90°(左)和 +90°(右)之间交替的听觉噪声,并使用脑电图记录神经反应(事件相关电位)。我们随机改变每个刺激之前的静音间隔持续时间,以创建一种具有与报告左听觉皮质对侧偏好的研究中使用的即时(局部)刺激背景相似的条件、一种具有与报告右听觉皮质对侧偏好的研究中局部背景相似的条件以及一种中间条件。令人惊讶的是,我们发现两个听觉皮质在所有条件下都表现出类似强烈的对侧偏好,对侧空间的反应平均比对侧空间大 27%。这表明两个皮质都可以表现出对侧偏好,但这些偏好是否表现取决于全局而非局部刺激背景。