Campos Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini, Spexoto Maria Cláudia Bernardes, Serrano Sergio Vicente, Maroco João
Departamento de Alimentos e Nutrição. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Araraquara, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rod. Araraquara-Jaú, km 01, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Barretos Cancer Hospital - Fundação Pio XII, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 13;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0400-8.
The psychometric properties of an instrument should be evaluated routinely when using different samples. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) when applied to a sample of Brazilian cancer patients.
The face, content, and construct (factorial, convergent, and discriminant) validities of the FACT-G were estimated. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted the ratio chi-square by degrees of freedom (χ (2)/df), the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) as indices. The invariance of the best model was assessed with multi-group analysis using the difference of chi-squares method (Δχ(2)). Convergent validity was assessed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and discriminant validity was determined via correlational analysis. Internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficient, and the Composite Reliability (CR) was estimated.
A total of 975 cancer patients participated in the study, with a mean age of 53.3 (SD = 13.0) years. Of these participants, 61.5 % were women. In CFA, five correlations between errors were included to fit the FACT-G to the sample (χ (2)/df = 8.611, CFI = .913, TLI = .902, RMSEA = .088). The model did not indicate invariant independent samples (Δχ(2): μ: p < .001, i: p < .958, Cov: p < .001, Res: p < .001). While there was adequate convergent validity for the physical well-being (AVE = .54) and social and family Well-being factors (AVE = .55), there was low convergent validity for the other factors. Reliability was adequate (CR = .76-.89 and α = .71-.82). Functional well-being, emotional well-being, and physical well-being were the factors that demonstrated a strong contribution to patients' health-related quality of life (β = -.99, .88, and .64, respectively).
The FACT-G was found to be a valid and reliable assessment of health-related quality of life in a Brazilian sample of patients with cancer.
使用不同样本时,应定期评估工具的心理测量特性。本研究评估了癌症治疗通用功能评估量表(FACT-G)应用于巴西癌症患者样本时的心理测量特性。
评估了FACT-G的表面效度、内容效度和结构效度(因子效度、收敛效度和区分效度)。进行验证性因子分析(CFA),以卡方与自由度之比(χ(2)/df)、比较拟合指数(CFI)、塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)和近似误差均方根(RMSEA)作为指标。使用卡方差异法(Δχ(2))通过多组分析评估最佳模型的不变性。使用平均提取方差(AVE)评估收敛效度,并通过相关分析确定区分效度。使用克朗巴哈α(α)系数评估内部一致性,并估计组合信度(CR)。
共有975名癌症患者参与研究,平均年龄为53.3岁(标准差=13.0)。其中,61.5%为女性。在CFA中,纳入了五个误差之间的相关性,以使FACT-G与样本拟合(χ(2)/df = 8.611,CFI = 0.913,TLI = 0.902,RMSEA = 0.088)。该模型未显示独立样本不变性(Δχ(2):均值:p < 0.001,截距:p < 0.958,协方差:p < 0.001,残差:p < 0.001)。虽然生理幸福感(AVE = 0.54)以及社会和家庭幸福感因子(AVE = 0.55)具有足够的收敛效度,但其他因子的收敛效度较低。信度足够(CR = 0.76 - 0.89,α = 0.71 - 0.82)。功能幸福感、情绪幸福感和生理幸福感是对患者健康相关生活质量有强烈贡献的因子(β分别为 -0.99、0.88和0.64)。
在巴西癌症患者样本中,FACT-G被发现是一种有效且可靠的健康相关生活质量评估工具。