Scott Greg, Clawson Jeff, Fivaz Mark C, McQueen Jennie, Gardett Marie I, Schultz Bryon, Youngquist Scott, Olola Christopher H O
1Research and Standards Division,International Academies of Emergency Dispatch,Salt Lake City,UtahUSA.
2Administration,Priority Solutions Inc.,Salt Lake City,UtahUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Feb;31(1):46-57. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005567. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Using the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) - a systematic 911 triage process - to identify a large subset of low-acuity patients for secondary nurse triage in the 911 center is a largely unstudied practice in North America. This study examines the ALPHA-level subset of low-acuity patients in the MPDS to determine the suitability of these patients for secondary triage by evaluating vital signs and necessity of lights-and-siren transport, as determined by attending Emergency Medical Services (EMS) ambulance crews.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical status of MPDS ALPHA-level (low-acuity) patients, as determined by on-scene EMS crews' patient care records, in two US agencies. A secondary objective was to determine which ALPHA-level codes are suitable candidates for secondary triage by a trained Emergency Communication Nurse (ECN).
In this retrospective study, one full year (2013) of both dispatch data and EMS patient records data, associated with all calls coded at the ALPHA-level (low-acuity) in the dispatch protocol, were collected. The primary outcome measure was the number and percentage of ALPHA-level codes categorized as low-acuity, moderate-acuity, high-acuity, and critical using four common vital signs to assign these categories: systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse rate (PR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). Vital sign data were obtained from ambulance crew electronic patient care records (ePCRs). The secondary endpoint was the number and percentage of ALPHA-level codes that received a "hot" (lights-and-siren) transport.
Out of 19,300 cases, 16,763 (86.9%) were included in the final analysis, after excluding cases from health care providers and those with missing data. Of those, 89% of all cases did not have even one vital sign indicator of unstable patient status (high or critical vital sign). Of all cases, only 1.1% were transported lights-and-siren.
With the exception of the low-acuity, ALPHA-level seizure cases, the ALPHA-level patients are suitable to transfer for secondary triage in a best-practices, accredited, emergency medical dispatch center that utilizes the MPDS at very high compliance rates. The secondary nurse triage process should identify the few at-risk patients that exist in the low-acuity calls.
使用医疗优先调度系统(MPDS)——一种系统的911分诊流程——在911中心识别出一大类低 acuity 患者进行二级护士分诊,这在北美很大程度上是一项未被研究的实践。本研究检查了MPDS中低 acuity 患者的ALPHA级子集,通过评估生命体征以及出诊的紧急医疗服务(EMS)救护人员确定的亮灯和鸣笛转运的必要性,来确定这些患者是否适合进行二级分诊。
本研究的主要目的是根据现场EMS工作人员的患者护理记录,确定美国两个机构中MPDS ALPHA级(低 acuity)患者的临床状况。次要目的是确定哪些ALPHA级代码是经过培训的紧急通信护士(ECN)进行二级分诊的合适候选对象。
在这项回顾性研究中,收集了与调度协议中所有编码为ALPHA级(低 acuity)的呼叫相关的一整年(2013年)的调度数据和EMS患者记录数据。主要结局指标是使用四种常见生命体征将ALPHA级代码分类为低 acuity、中度 acuity、高 acuity 和危急的数量及百分比,这四种生命体征用于划分这些类别:收缩压(SBP)、脉搏率(PR)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)。生命体征数据来自救护人员的电子患者护理记录(ePCR)。次要终点是接受“热”(亮灯和鸣笛)转运的ALPHA级代码的数量及百分比。
在19300例病例中,排除来自医疗保健提供者的病例和数据缺失的病例后,16763例(86.9%)纳入最终分析。其中,所有病例中有89%甚至没有一项生命体征指标显示患者状态不稳定(高或危急生命体征)。在所有病例中,只有1.1%通过亮灯和鸣笛转运。
除了低 acuity 的ALPHA级癫痫病例外,ALPHA级患者适合在采用MPDS且合规率非常高的最佳实践、获得认证的紧急医疗调度中心进行二级分诊转移。二级护士分诊流程应识别出低 acuity 呼叫中存在的少数高危患者。