Suppr超能文献

23价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗预防高危成人肺炎球菌肺炎的疗效——一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy of PPV23 in Preventing Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adults at Increased Risk--A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Schiffner-Rohe Julia, Witt Annika, Hemmerling Jana, von Eiff Christof, Leverkus Friedrich-Wilhelm

机构信息

Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, Linkstr. 10, 10785, Berlin, Germany.

AMS-Advanced Medical Services GmbH, Rosa-Bavarese-Str.5, 80639, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 13;11(1):e0146338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146338. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (pCAP) is the most frequent form of pneumonia. The elderly and adults with underlying diseases are at an increased risk of developing pCAP. The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) was licensed over 30 years ago and is recommended as the standard intervention in many countries across the globe, although its efficacy continues to be debated. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the effect of PPV23 for preventing pCAP in adults ≥60 years of age.

METHODS

An existing Cochrane Review was updated to Oct 2014 using a systematic literature search to select appropriate RCTs. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects meta-analyses were performed and odd ratios (OR) with 95%-confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were calculated for the descriptive analyses. Reasons for heterogeneity were explored by subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of PPV23 efficacy included four studies. Three of them did not demonstrate efficacy for PPV23. The body of evidence indicated statistically significant heterogeneity (I2 = 78%, p = 0.004) that could be explained by subgroup analysis by "study setting". Further effect modifiers for pCAP were "continent of trial" (p<0.01), and "method of pneumococcal diagnostics" (p = 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that the only study showing efficacy for PPV23 was an outlier. Overall, the validity of the meta-analytic PPV23 efficacy assessment was confirmed by the meta-analysis of all-cause CAP including six studies.

DISCUSSION

Inconsistencies in PPV23 treatment effects to prevent pCAP could solely be explained by one outlier study that was performed in nursing homes in Japan. The effect modifier "method of pneumococcal diagnostics" should be interpreted carefully, since methodological weaknesses are not restricted to one special method only, which would justify the exclusion of certain studies. Overall, we conclude from our meta-analysis that to date there is no proof that PPV23 can prevent pCAP in a general, community-dwelling elderly population.

摘要

背景

肺炎球菌社区获得性肺炎(pCAP)是最常见的肺炎类型。老年人和患有基础疾病的成年人患pCAP的风险增加。23价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗(PPV23)在30多年前获得许可,在全球许多国家被推荐作为标准干预措施,尽管其疗效仍存在争议。我们进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,以研究PPV23对预防≥60岁成年人pCAP的效果。

方法

使用系统文献检索更新至2014年10月的现有Cochrane综述,以选择合适的RCT。进行DerSimonian和Laird随机效应荟萃分析,并计算描述性分析的比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)和p值。通过亚组分析探讨异质性的原因。

结果

PPV23疗效的荟萃分析纳入了四项研究。其中三项未证明PPV23有效。证据显示存在统计学上显著的异质性(I2 = 78%,p = 0.004),通过按“研究环境”进行亚组分析可以解释这种异质性。pCAP的其他效应修饰因素为“试验所在大洲”(p<0.01)和“肺炎球菌诊断方法”(p = 0.001)。亚组分析显示,唯一显示PPV23有效的研究是一个异常值。总体而言,包括六项研究的全因性CAP的荟萃分析证实了PPV23疗效评估的荟萃分析的有效性。

讨论

PPV23预防pCAP治疗效果的不一致性可能仅由在日本养老院进行的一项异常值研究来解释。应谨慎解释效应修饰因素“肺炎球菌诊断方法”,因为方法学弱点不限于一种特殊方法,这将证明排除某些研究是合理的。总体而言,我们从荟萃分析中得出结论,迄今为止,没有证据表明PPV23可以在一般社区居住的老年人群中预防pCAP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67f4/4711910/24b68103ecd1/pone.0146338.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验