Wong Martin C S, Ching Jessica Y L, Chan Victor C W, Lam Thomas Y T, Luk Arthur K C, Tang Raymond S Y, Wong Sunny H, Ng Siew C, Ng Simon S M, Wu Justin C Y, Chan Francis K L, Sung Joseph J Y
From the Institute of Digestive Disease (MCSW, JYLC, VCWC, TYTL, AKCL, RSYT, SHW, SCN, SSMN, JCYW, FKLC, JJYS); and School of Public Health and Primary Care (MCSW), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002251.
The predictors of poor bowel preparation in colorectal cancer screening participants have not been adequately studied, and the association between the quality of bowel preparation and adenoma detection has not been firmly established. This study examined the determinants of poor bowel preparation, and evaluated its relationship with adenoma detection.We included subjects aged between 50 and 70 years who received colonoscopy between 2008 and 2014 in a colorectal cancer screening program in Hong Kong. The quality of the bowel preparation was assessed by colonoscopists, and the factors associated with poor bowel cleansing were evaluated by a binary logistic regression analysis. A multivariate regression model was constructed to evaluate if poor bowel preparation was associated with detection of colorectal neoplasia.From 5470 screening participants (average age 57.7 years, SD 4.9), 1891 (34.6%) had poor or fair bowel preparation. The average cecal intubation time was 7.0 minutes (SD 5.4; range 1.22-36.9 minutes) and the average colonoscopy withdrawal time was 10.8 minutes (SD 6.9; range 6.0-107.0 minutes). Among all, 26.5% had colorectal neoplasia and 5.5% had advanced neoplasia. Older age (≥60 years; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.19-1.38, P = 0.02-0.04), male sex (AOR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.60, P < 0.001), and current smoking (AOR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.14-1.75, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with poor/fair bowel preparation. Poorer cleansing resulted in significantly lower detection rate of neoplasia (AOR = 0.35-0.62) and advanced neoplasia (AOR = 0.36-0.50) irrespective of polyp size.Steps to improve proper procedures of bowel preparation are warranted, especially among subjects at risk of poor bowel preparation. Strategies should be implemented to improve bowel cleansing, which is now demonstrated as a definite quality indicator.
在结直肠癌筛查参与者中,肠道准备不佳的预测因素尚未得到充分研究,肠道准备质量与腺瘤检测之间的关联也尚未完全确立。本研究探讨了肠道准备不佳的决定因素,并评估了其与腺瘤检测的关系。我们纳入了2008年至2014年在香港一项结直肠癌筛查项目中接受结肠镜检查的50至70岁受试者。结肠镜检查医生评估肠道准备质量,并通过二元逻辑回归分析评估与肠道清洁不佳相关的因素。构建多变量回归模型以评估肠道准备不佳是否与结直肠肿瘤的检测相关。在5470名筛查参与者(平均年龄57.7岁,标准差4.9)中,1891名(34.6%)的肠道准备不佳或一般。平均盲肠插管时间为7.0分钟(标准差5.4;范围1.22 - 36.9分钟),平均结肠镜检查退出时间为10.8分钟(标准差6.9;范围6.0 - 107.0分钟)。其中,26.5%患有结直肠肿瘤,5.5%患有进展期肿瘤。年龄较大(≥60岁;调整后的优势比[AOR]=1.19 - 1.38,P=0.02 - 0.04)、男性(AOR=1.38,95%置信区间[CI]1.19 - 1.60,P<0.001)和当前吸烟(AOR=1.41,95%CI 1.14 - 1.75,P=0.002)与肠道准备不佳或一般显著相关。无论息肉大小,清洁效果较差都会导致肿瘤(AOR=0.35 - 0.62)和进展期肿瘤(AOR=0.36 - 0.50)的检测率显著降低。有必要采取措施改进肠道准备的正确程序,特别是在肠道准备不佳风险较高的受试者中。应实施策略以改善肠道清洁,目前已证明这是一个明确无误的质量指标。