Suppr超能文献

甲磺酸萘莫司他与肝素作为溃疡性结肠炎白细胞单采术中抗凝剂的安全性和耐受性:一项大规模、前瞻性、观察性研究的事后分析

Safety and Tolerability of Nafamostat Mesilate and Heparin as Anticoagulants in Leukocytapheresis for Ulcerative Colitis: Post Hoc Analysis of a Large-Scale, Prospective, Observational Study.

作者信息

Sawada Koji, Ohdo Maiko, Ino Tomoko, Nakamura Takashi, Numata Toyoko, Shibata Hiroshi, Sakou Jun-ichi, Kusada Masahiro, Hibi Toshifumi

机构信息

Dojima General & Gastroenterology Clinic, Osaka, Japan.

Scientific and Technical Affairs Department, Japan Operation Division, Blood Purification Business Unit, Asahi Kasei Medical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Ther Apher Dial. 2016 Apr;20(2):197-204. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12357. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Abstract

Nafamostat mesilate is the first anticoagulant of choice for leukocytapheresis (LCAP) with a Cellsorba E column for treating ulcerative colitis (UC). However, because of complications, mainly due to allergy to nafamostat mesilate, heparin may be used as a substitute. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of nafamostat mesilate and heparin as anticoagulants in LCAP for UC, we conducted post hoc analysis of data from a large-scale, prospective, observational study of LCAP, which was conducted at 116 medical facilities in Japan between May 2010 and December 2012. Of 832 patients included in this analysis, nafamostat mesilate and heparin were used in 676 (81.3%) and 113 (13.6%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions (8.6% vs. 7.1%) and intrafilter pressure increases (12.7% vs. 16.8%) between the nafamostat mesilate and heparin groups. Adverse reactions of hemorrhage or blood pressure decreases associated with heparin use were not observed. There were no significant differences in rates of clinical remission (69.1% vs. 68.1%) and mucosal healing (62.9% vs. 63.6%) between the nafamostat mesilate and heparin groups. Thus, the safety and tolerability were comparable in the nafamostat mesilate and heparin groups, indicating that both nafamostat mesilate and heparin can be well tolerated as anticoagulants in LCAP for UC.

摘要

甲磺酸萘莫司他是使用Cellsorba E柱进行白细胞去除术(LCAP)治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)时的首选抗凝剂。然而,由于并发症,主要是对甲磺酸萘莫司他过敏,肝素可作为替代品使用。为了评估甲磺酸萘莫司他和肝素作为UC的LCAP抗凝剂的安全性和耐受性,我们对一项在2010年5月至2012年12月期间于日本116家医疗机构进行的大规模、前瞻性、观察性LCAP研究的数据进行了事后分析。在纳入本次分析的832例患者中,分别有676例(81.3%)和113例(13.6%)使用了甲磺酸萘莫司他和肝素。甲磺酸萘莫司他组和肝素组之间的不良反应发生率(8.6%对7.1%)和滤器内压力升高发生率(12.7%对16.8%)无显著差异。未观察到与肝素使用相关的出血或血压下降等不良反应。甲磺酸萘莫司他组和肝素组之间的临床缓解率(69.1%对68.1%)和黏膜愈合率(62.9%对63.6%)无显著差异。因此,甲磺酸萘莫司他组和肝素组的安全性和耐受性相当,表明甲磺酸萘莫司他和肝素作为UC的LCAP抗凝剂均能被良好耐受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验