Vafaei Afshin, Ahmed Tamer, Freire Aline do N Falcão, Zunzunegui Maria Victoria, Guerra Ricardo O
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 15;11(1):e0146867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146867. eCollection 2016.
To assess the associations between gender roles and depression in older men and women and whether gender roles are independent risk factors for depression.
International cross-sectional study of adults between 65 and 74 years old (n = 1,967). Depression was defined by a score of 16 or over in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). A validated 12-item Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) was used to classify participants in gender roles (Masculine, Feminine, Androgynous, and Undifferentiated) using research site medians of femininity and masculinity as cut-off points. Poisson regressions were fitted to estimate the prevalence ratios (PR) of depression for each gender role compared to the masculine role, adjusting for sex, sufficiency of income, education, marital status, self-rated health, and chronic conditions.
Among men, 31.2% were androgynous, 26% were masculine, 14.4% were feminine, and 28.4% were undifferentiated; among women, the corresponding percentages were 32.7%, 14.9%, 27%, and 25.4%. Both in men and in women, depressive symptoms (CES-D≥16) were more prevalent in those endorsing the undifferentiated type, compared to masculine, feminine or androgynous groups. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, compared to the masculine group only those endorsing the androgynous role were 28% less likely to suffer from depression: PR of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.55-0.93). In fully adjusted models, prevalence rates of depression were not different from masculine participants in the two other gender groups of feminine and undifferentiated.
Androgynous roles were associated with lower rates of depression in older adults, independently of being a man or a woman.
评估老年男性和女性的性别角色与抑郁症之间的关联,以及性别角色是否为抑郁症的独立危险因素。
对1967名65至74岁的成年人进行国际横断面研究。抑郁症由流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)得分16分及以上定义。使用经过验证的12项贝姆性别角色量表(BSRI),以女性气质和男性气质的研究地点中位数为分界点,将参与者分类为不同的性别角色(男性化、女性化、双性化和未分化)。采用泊松回归来估计与男性化角色相比,每种性别角色患抑郁症的患病率比(PR),并对性别、收入充足程度、教育程度、婚姻状况、自评健康状况和慢性病进行调整。
男性中,31.2%为双性化,26%为男性化,14.4%为女性化,28.4%为未分化;女性中,相应比例分别为32.7%、14.9%。27%和25.4%。与男性化、女性化或双性化组相比,未分化类型的男性和女性中,抑郁症状(CES-D≥16)更为普遍。然而,在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,与男性化组相比,只有认可双性化角色的人患抑郁症的可能性降低了28%:患病率比为0.72(95%置信区间:0.55-0.9)。在完全调整模型中,女性化和未分化这两个其他性别组的抑郁症患病率与男性化参与者没有差异。
双性化角色与老年人较低的抑郁症发病率相关,与男性或女性身份无关。