最高法院、隐私权与堕胎 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.

作者信息

Annas G J

机构信息

Boston University School of Medicine, MA 02118.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1989 Oct 26;321(17):1200-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198910263211720.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198910263211720

PMID:2677728

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.

N Engl J Med. 1989 Oct 26;321(17):1200-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198910263211720.

Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.

J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995.

Webster versus reproductive health services.

MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1989 Nov-Dec;14(6):423.

The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.

N Engl J Med. 1992 Aug 27;327(9):651-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199208273270920.

Four-one-four.

Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Sep-Oct;19(5):27-9.

A world without Roe: how different would it be?

Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Jul-Aug;19(4):30-1.

The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.

Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.

Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.

Legal aspects of abortion practice.

Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;13(1):135-43.

Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.

Law Med Health Care. 1989 Winter;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1989.tb01118.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

The Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.

N Engl J Med. 1989 Oct 26;321(17):1200-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198910263211720.

Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.

J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995.

Webster versus reproductive health services.

MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1989 Nov-Dec;14(6):423.

The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.

N Engl J Med. 1992 Aug 27;327(9):651-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199208273270920.

Four-one-four.

Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Sep-Oct;19(5):27-9.

A world without Roe: how different would it be?

Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Jul-Aug;19(4):30-1.

The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.

Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.

Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.

Legal aspects of abortion practice.

Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;13(1):135-43.

Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.

Law Med Health Care. 1989 Winter;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1989.tb01118.x.