Chi Chen, Tai Chenhui, Bai Bin, Yu Shikai, Karamanou Marianna, Wang Jiguang, Protogerou Athanase, Blacher Jacques, Safar Michel E, Zhang Yi, Xu Yawei
Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
University Institute of History of Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Aug;18(8):801-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12771. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
The authors aimed to investigate the superiority of angiotensin system blockade (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) plus a calcium channel blocker (CCB) (A+C) over other combination therapies in antihypertensive treatment. A meta-analysis in 20,451 hypertensive patients from eight randomized controlled trials was conducted to compare the A+C treatment with other combination therapies in terms of blood pressure (BP) reduction, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. The results showed that BP reduction did not differ significantly among the A+C therapy and other combination therapies in systolic and diastolic BP (P=.87 and P=.56, respectively). However, A+C therapy, compared with other combination therapies, achieved a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular composite endpoints, including cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke (risk ratio [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91; P<.001), but similar all-cause mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.04; P=.15) and stroke rates (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.04; P=.09). Moreover, A+C therapy yielded a 4.21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) lower estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction than other combinations (P<.001). Finally, A+C therapy showed a similar incidence of adverse events as other combination therapies (P=.34) but presented a significantly lower incidence of serious adverse events (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.98; P=.03). In conclusion, A+C therapy is superior to other combinations of antihypertensive treatment as it shows a lower incidence of cardiovascular events and adverse events, while it has similar effects in lowering BP and preserving renal function.
作者旨在研究血管紧张素系统阻滞剂(血管紧张素转换酶[ACE]抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂[ARB])联合钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)(A+C)在降压治疗中相较于其他联合治疗方案的优势。对来自八项随机对照试验的20451例高血压患者进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较A+C治疗与其他联合治疗方案在血压降低、临床结局和不良事件方面的差异。结果显示,A+C治疗与其他联合治疗方案在收缩压和舒张压降低方面无显著差异(分别为P=0.87和P=0.56)。然而,与其他联合治疗方案相比,A+C治疗的心血管复合终点发生率显著更低,包括心血管死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死和非致死性卒中(风险比[RR],0.80;95%置信区间[CI],0.70-0.91;P<0.001),但全因死亡率(RR,0.90;95%CI,0.77-1.04;P=0.15)和卒中发生率相似(RR,0.90;95%CI,0.77-1.04;P=0.09)。此外,A+C治疗比其他联合治疗使估算肾小球滤过率降低值低4.21 mL/min/1.73 m²(P<0.001)。最后,A+C治疗的不良事件发生率与其他联合治疗方案相似(P=0.34),但严重不良事件发生率显著更低(RR,0.85;95%CI,0.73-0.98;P=0.03)。总之,A+C治疗优于其他降压治疗联合方案,因为它显示出更低的心血管事件和不良事件发生率,同时在降低血压和保护肾功能方面具有相似效果。