Vílchez Juan I, Navas Alfonso, González-López Jesús, Arcos Susana C, Manzanera Maximino
Institute for Water Research and Department of Microbiology, University of Granada Granada, Spain.
Biodiversidad y Biologia Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Madrid, Spain.
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jan 7;6:1514. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01514. eCollection 2015.
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) colonize plants and enhance their growth by different mechanisms. Some of these microorganisms may represent a potential threat to human, animal or plant health; however, their use might be approved in parts of Europe if they have been recommended as plant growth enhancers. The current regulatory framework has resulted in a fragmented, contradictory system, and there is an urgent need to establish harmonized protocols for the predictability, efficiency, consistency and especially the safety of PGPB for human and animal health and for the environment. In response to current efforts to update biosafety policies and provide alternative methods to replace the use of vertebrate animals, we propose a panel of tests and an evaluation system to reliably determine the biosafety of bacterial strains used as PGPB. Based on the results of different tests, we propose a scoring system to evaluate the safety of candidates for PGPB within the limitations of the assays used.
植物促生细菌(PGPB)定殖于植物并通过不同机制促进其生长。其中一些微生物可能对人类、动物或植物健康构成潜在威胁;然而,如果它们被推荐为植物生长促进剂,在欧洲部分地区其使用可能会被批准。当前的监管框架导致了一个碎片化、相互矛盾的体系,迫切需要建立统一的协议,以确保PGPB在人类和动物健康以及环境方面的可预测性、有效性、一致性,尤其是安全性。为响应当前更新生物安全政策以及提供替代方法以取代脊椎动物使用的努力,我们提出了一组测试和一个评估系统,以可靠地确定用作PGPB的细菌菌株的生物安全性。基于不同测试的结果,我们提出了一个评分系统,用于在所使用检测方法的局限性内评估PGPB候选菌株的安全性。